Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML

On Mar 31, 2008, at 22:14, Bruce Miller wrote:
> No, I'm not insisting that, at all.
> Perhaps I haven't been clear, or I'm misunderstanding you.

OK. Great. (Sorry.)

> My concern was that the browser, after parsing whatever form
> into a DOM, would be required (or _very_ strongly encouraged)
> to allow exporting that DOM as XML.   Then, _any_ MathML (ditto SVG)
> application could use the result, including old, strict MathML
> applications on the one hand, to HTML5 browsers on the other.

I'd be OK with strong encouragement. (It wouldn't make sense as a  
requirement for kiosk browsers, for example.) But like I said, I'm not  
worried either way, since Firefox already has View MathML Source.

-- 
Henri Sivonen
hsivonen@iki.fi
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/

Received on Monday, 31 March 2008 19:44:13 UTC