- From: Michael Kohlhase <m.kohlhase@jacobs-university.de>
- Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 07:41:50 +0200
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- CC: Bruce Miller <bruce.miller@nist.gov>, public-html@w3.org, www-math@w3.org
Ian Hickson wrote: > On Sat, 29 Mar 2008, Bruce Miller wrote: > >> I personally think the most compelling case for annotations, especially >> in a web context, is to provide presentation MathML for display to >> humans, along with the corresponding content MathML (when available) for >> export to applications (or perhaps for audio rendering, or ...). >> > > I agree, but that isn't a problem we're trying to solve for HTML5: > > http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/New_Vocabularies > > Nobody includes the equivalent of content MathML when writing their papers > using LaTeX. Why would they do so with HTML? > As I said in the other thread, e.g. for search engines that feed on content representations. In our interactions with Math publishers there seemed to be interest in this. Michael -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Prof. Dr. Michael Kohlhase, Office: Research 1, Room 62 Professor of Computer Science Campus Ring 12, School of Engineering & Science D-28759 Bremen, Germany Jacobs University Bremen* tel/fax: +49 421 200-3140/-493140 m.kohlhase@jacobs-university.de http://kwarc.info/kohlhase skype: m.kohlhase * International University Bremen until Feb. 2007 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Sunday, 30 March 2008 05:42:25 UTC