- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 23:23:04 +0300
- To: Justin James <j_james@mindspring.com>
- Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, Public MathML mailing list <www-math@w3.org>
On Apr 1, 2008, at 23:08, Justin James wrote: > I agree completely. The options are really simple, regardless of how > many > various examples we throw at this question. > > 1) [...] > 2) [...] > 3) [...] > 4) [...] 5) Define how to parse text/html is such a way that some elements get put in the SVG and MathML namespaces in the DOM. Require that these element be processed the same way as if they were parsed out of an application/xhtml+xml data stream. Leave the definition of what that way is to the SVG and MathML specs noting that those specs need to take stance on non-sensical element nesting structures even in the application/xhtml+xml case. > Whatever we do, it must be sustainable not just for the MathML > question > today, but for future new vocabularies as well. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2008Mar/0051.html -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Tuesday, 1 April 2008 20:23:46 UTC