- From: Robert Miner <robertm@dessci.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 08:49:23 -0700
- To: "Michael Weitzel" <michael.weitzel@uni-siegen.de>
- Cc: <www-math@w3.org>
Michael, I'm not knowledgeable about sparse matrix representations. Are there a couple "standard" ones that are widely supported, and if so, what are they like? If not, what is your view to the "pure OpenMath" approach using csymbol that David Carlisle and Bill Naylor are talking about. --Robert Robert Miner Director, New Product Development Design Science, Inc. 140 Pine Avenue, 4th Floor Long Beach, California 90802 USA Tel: (651) 223-2883 Fax: (651) 292-0014 robertm@dessci.com www.dessci.com ~ Makers of MathType, MathFlow, MathPlayer, WebEQ, Equation Editor, TexAide ~ > -----Original Message----- > From: www-math-request@w3.org [mailto:www-math-request@w3.org] On Behalf > Of Michael Weitzel > Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 5:25 AM > To: www-math@w3.org > Subject: sparse matrix support in MathML > > > Hi, > > I definitely miss support for sparse matrices in Content-MathML. Loading > and saving tons of zeros involves ugly delays for large sparse matrices > and unnecessarily bloats the XML files. Sadly, MathML version 3 does not > introduce such a type. Programming environments like Matlab/Octave and > Maple support sparse matrices -- MathML should likewise. > > regards, > -- > Michael Weitzel >
Received on Wednesday, 30 May 2007 15:49:43 UTC