- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 15:01:09 +0100
- To: michael.weitzel@uni-siegen.de
- Cc: www-math@w3.org
> Sadly, MathML version 3 does not introduce such a type. MathML3 is at first working draft stage, so the functionality that gets added in the end is still up for discussion. so now's a good time to raise items for inclusion, so thanks for starting this thread... > .... support sparse matrices Of course in some sense mathml does already Comparing with OpenMath, Openmath doesn't have built in support for sparse matrices (or anything else) but does have some CDs for specific constructs, eg banded matrix CD here http://www.openmath.org/cd/linalg5.xhtml#banded The new chapter 4 suggests a much closer relationship between mathml csymbol usage and openmath Cds which would suggest (even in mathML2) the example given there, which is banded (vector (vector (4, 8, 12, 15) , vector (1, 5, 9, 13, 16) , vector (2, 6, 10, 14) , vector (3, 7, 11) ) ) being represented as something like <apply> <!-- following csymbol could use definition URL, or in MathML3 draft cdbase attributes to refer to http://www.openmath.org/cd/linalg5.xhtml#banded --> <csymbol>banded</csymbol> <vector> <vector><cn>4</cn> <cn>8</cn> <cn>12</cn> <cn>15</cn></vector> <vector><cn>1</cn> <cn>5</cn> <cn>9</cn> <cn>13</cn> <cn>16</cn></vector> <vector><cn>2</cn> <cn>6</cn> <cn>10</cn> <cn>14</cn></vector> <vector><cn>3</cn> <cn>7</cn> <cn>11</cn></vector> </vector> Of course there is always a tradeoff between using a generic csymbol construct (the pure openmath approach) which gives most flexibility in what may be expressed, but least guarantee that any particular construct is supported by any given application, and the "classic k-12 MathML" approach of having a core set of functionality built into the language which is distinguished by a custom syntax and which perhaps therefore has a better chance of being supported by applictaions which aim to support "all" of MathML. So just because something can be expressed using csymbol doesn't mean that it shouldn't be implemented using a custom syntax such as (inventing something just for discussion purposes) <matrix type="banded"> <vector><cn>4</cn> <cn>8</cn> <cn>12</cn> <cn>15</cn></vector> <vector><cn>1</cn> <cn>5</cn> <cn>9</cn> <cn>13</cn> <cn>16</cn></vector> <vector><cn>2</cn> <cn>6</cn> <cn>10</cn> <cn>14</cn></vector> <vector><cn>3</cn> <cn>7</cn> <cn>11</cn></vector> </matrix> It's just a matter of what people need/want/can implement, etc..... David ________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
Received on Wednesday, 30 May 2007 14:01:40 UTC