- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 18:00:07 +0000 (UTC)
- To: juanrgonzaleza@canonicalscience.com
- Cc: www-math@w3.org
On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 juanrgonzaleza@canonicalscience.com wrote: > > > > I've seen hundreds of thousands of occurances of bogus meaningless > > things like this: > > > > <br xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"> > > > > ...as well as many thousands of pages with xmlns="" values pointing to > > their own sites (as opposed to any sort of half-sensible namespace). > > Your above <br> example, i would call that misuse, rather than use, of > the xmlns. Oh it's clearly a misuse (it's non-conformant); but, it's there. > Then now Mozilla is moving to Math(T)ml into HTML 5 but what about XML? I do not believe any of the people proposing that HTML should include some variant of Math markup are suggesting that MathML in XML should in any way be changed. > P.S: You have said too many times that you could not implement original > CCS-Math draft not MathML into HTML 5 because technical motives with the > browser. You now add: > > > I've worked with one browser vendor who tried implementing this > > namespace thing before, and had to back out because it broke real > > content in pretty fundamental ways.) > > I recommend you a change in your Your e-mail seemed incomplete. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 10 October 2006 18:00:50 UTC