- From: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 01:01:59 +1100
- To: Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- CC: www-math@w3.org, WHAT WG List <whatwg@whatwg.org>
Elliotte Harold wrote: > Lachlan Hunt wrote: >> Why is the specific syntax so important? > > The specific syntax is important because there's a huge, useful > toolchain for processing XML and there's essentially zilch for > processing this strange HTML 5 thing. In the real world, you cannot expect to be be able to process content served as text/html using XML tools. That's like trying to compile Java with a C++ compiler. Despite the similarities in syntax, they are different languages that require different parsers. > Why not ditch the HTML 5 layer completely and simply allow the XML tools > direct access? Because we have to remain compatible with the web, where there are an infinite number of existing documents that browsers must be able to handle interoperably. > Who, exactly is this HTML serialization supposed to help? Anyone for whom interoperability in processing real world content is important. This includes, among others: * Browser vendors that have to deal with real world content. * CMS, editor, and other tool vendors that have to accept HTML input from users. * Authors that have to develop for the real world. * Users who like to surf the web in any browser they choose. -- Lachlan Hunt http://lachy.id.au/
Received on Sunday, 5 November 2006 14:02:15 UTC