- From: <juanrgonzaleza@canonicalscience.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 09:17:16 -0700 (PDT)
- To: <www-math@w3.org>
White Lynx wrote: [snip] > Yes mmultiscripts is too awkward for pure CSS rendering. You may try something like > <mpsup><mi>prescript</mi><mi>Base</mi></mpsup> > <mpsub><mi>prescript</mi><mi>Base</mi></mpsub> > <mpsupsub><mprescripts><mi>prescript</mi><mi>prescript</mi></mprescripts><mi>Base</mi></mpsupsub> > for prescripts. [snip] I said in a previous communication that the phrase "Elsevier adopts MathML" was to be very debatable. It may be interesting to note here that in last Elsevier’s CEP 1.1.0-1.1.3 (the core of Elsevier’s 2005 XML DTDs family) 238 U 92 is encoded like <ce:sup loc="pre">238</ce:sup><ce:inf loc="pre">92</ce:inf>U with ce the "core" namespace xmlns:ce="http://www.elsevier.com/xml/common/dtd" Above encoding is very similar to original XML-MAIDEN approach and related to changes needed on MathML above listed. Juan R. Center for CANONICAL |SCIENCE)
Received on Monday, 17 April 2006 16:17:29 UTC