- From: <juanrgonzaleza@canonicalscience.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 05:13:48 -0700 (PDT)
- To: <www-math@w3.org>
And as one would wait due to several flaws of MathML, the pages with MathML are being cited here and I have revised are not correct. The structure of equations is not accurate in all equation I have revised, the semantic is incorrect also, one finds several tricks for rendering, etc. What is more, the accessibility of MathML formulas are being presented here (and I have revised) is poor that if using the old HTML+GIF model in several cases. I did a simple review of incorrect output was being presented by HERMES. The XHTML+MathML code was very wrong. I am doing a serious review of very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very incorrect MathML code is being served by self-proclaimed technologically more advanced site. Details in a future Canonical Science Today. I will add review of code at NAG and New York Journal of Mathematics in a future “issue”. Juan R. Center for CANONICAL |SCIENCE)
Received on Friday, 14 April 2006 12:13:53 UTC