- From: Bruce Miller <bruce.miller@nist.gov>
- Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2006 12:18:31 -0400
- To: www-math@w3.org
juanrgonzaleza@canonicalscience.com wrote: > What is the objective of repeating I already said? I'm wondering the same thing. juanrgonzaleza@canonicalscience.com wrote: > Any case the point is not possible misunderstanding about above > ASCII art did mean. The fact that everyone is asking what it meant and interpreting it differently than you apparently intended just might be a clue that it, in fact, _is_ possible to misunderstand. Being a student, to varying degrees of success, of a few foreign languages, I'm generally not given to criticizing non-native speakers of english. However, I think that your comments would be more productive --- assuming you're actually trying to have a constructive discussion --- if you would spend a bit more effort (1) attempting to understand the explanations that have already been given to you and (2) explaining carefully and concisely exactly what you are looking for. Ranting, yelling, insulting and repeating yourself ever louder, all the while claiming that you couldn't possibly be misunderstood really isn't that productive. Nor does it reflect well on either you or the "Canonical Science" project. -- bruce.miller@nist.gov http://math.nist.gov/~BMiller/
Received on Friday, 7 April 2006 16:18:46 UTC