- From: Frank Yung-Fong Tang <franktang@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 17:17:22 -0500
- To: Michael Kay <mhk@mhk.me.uk>
- Cc: www-math@w3.org, public-qt-comments@w3.org
Generalize two issues and redesign abstraction to reuse exising facility is always harder than invent a new one in the short term. > I've no idea whether the idea has any merit. Probably none untill someone try to use both of them to build a system when one set of data model are stored in MathML Content Markup (say "all the y on Y = x^2 + 4x -3" and the other "all the y on Y = 4*x^3 -2") and the other half store the query inside XQuery (say youc an switch between "Find all the Z element which no child of Z have value y fit into the line of Y" and "Find all the Z elements which it's parent have a attribute that it's value y fig the line of Y ). It will be nice if both model use the same 'language' to store the math model. On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 22:01:25 -0000, Michael Kay <mhk@mhk.me.uk> wrote: > > > 1. Have anyone consider or try to spec out a XQueryX proposal that use > > the MathML Content Markup as spec out in > > http://www.w3.org/TR/MathML2/chapter4.html to express XQuery into XML > > syntax ? It looks like the MathML content markup should be powerful to > > express most of the XQuery syntax, even the XPath part. > > > No, I don't think anyone has looked at this possibility. I've no idea > whether the idea has any merit. If you feel it has, I suggest you write a > paper on the topic for an XML conference. If it seems to offer benefits, I'm > sure someone will pick it up. > > > > > 2. Any one have experience of using XQuery with MathML content markup? > > Not that I'm aware of. There's a lot of experience using XSLT, however. > > Michael Kay > Saxonica Limited > > -- Frank Yung-Fong Tang 譚永鋒 Šýšţém Årçĥîţéçţ
Received on Tuesday, 8 March 2005 22:17:54 UTC