- From: Roger I Martin PhD <hypernexdev@hypernexinc.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 11:11:29 -0500
- To: www-math@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 23 February 2005 16:16:40 UTC
From the table http://www.w3.org/TR/MathML2/appendixd.html#dom.elementTable it can be seen that many elements have the MathMLPredefinedSymbol <http://www.w3.org/TR/MathML2/appendixd.html#dom.PredefinedSymbol> interface. Maybe the short question and answer would be: is it intended that an implementor should extend the MathMLPredefinedSymbol <http://www.w3.org/TR/MathML2/appendixd.html#dom.PredefinedSymbol> for each associated element? then get all it's siblings that define it from the parent apply? Or extend apply for each possible fiirst operation child(treating it like an attribute)? O many cases under MathMLApplyElement? Take http://www.w3.org/TR/MathML2/chapter4.html#contm.partialdiff for example. The number of bvars and their degrees effect the presentation considerably. Under what interface would the presentation be recommended? Any ideas? Considerations? -Roger
Received on Wednesday, 23 February 2005 16:16:40 UTC