- From: Bob Mathews <bobm@dessci.com>
- Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 07:06:28 -0500
- To: www-math@w3.org
At 04:23 9/9/2004 -0400, Bruce Miller wrote: >>My other problem is brackets - even where we have brackets >>within brackets, we'd like to just use <mo>(</mo> etc - is >>that OK? We tried <mfence> but we did not get to see the >>brackets, so didn't like it??? > >By "see" you mean in the xml source, as opposed to in some >browser? There're reasons to both love & hate mfenced. It >seems to sit halfway between "Content" and "Presentation", and >it gives a headache to a CSS approach to presenting the >math.... But, really the answer is: Whichever you prefer. Yes, but it's also possible Liddy's group didn't see the brackets if they spelled the element name without the d (as above). It's <mfenced>, not <mfence>. Bob Mathews Director of Training http://www.dessci.com/ Design Science, Inc. -- "How Science Communicates" MathType, WebEQ, MathPlayer, MathFlow, Equation Editor, TeXaide
Received on Thursday, 9 September 2004 12:07:47 UTC