- From: Semirat Stephan <Stephan.Semirat@ac-grenoble.fr>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 12:50:28 +0100
- To: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Cc: Vincent.Quint@inria.fr, www-math@w3.org
However, when you write the formula by hand on a paper (i think that is what to be expected by a "good" renderer, isn't it ? that is to be the most readable possible) you only stretch parenthesis with what they contain, do you ? So my view is that Mozilla has made the good choice... Regards, Stephan ---- Messages dŽorigine ---- De: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> Date: Vendredi, Janvier 30, 2004 11:48 am Objet: Re: When to stretch parentheses > > > > Is my reasoning right? Or should Amaya do the same as Mozilla? > > The text comes from MathML 1 before I joined the group, but my > understanding has always been that you are right: elements with an > "implied mrow" should behave in all respects as if the implied > mrow were > actually there. So in this case, the parentheses should stretch to > a size > determined by the (implied) mrow containing all the children of the > outer math element. > > David > > > > -- > http://www.dcarlisle.demon.co.uk/matthew > > ________________________________________________________________________ > This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The > service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive > anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: > http://www.star.net.uk > ________________________________________________________________________ > >
Received on Friday, 30 January 2004 06:51:42 UTC