- From: Paul Libbrecht <paul@activemath.org>
- Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 00:28:03 +0200
- To: www-math@w3.org
On 16-Apr-04, at 17:17 Uhr, Robert Miner wrote: > In case it is useful to you, I should add that I think in current > practice, mixed markup is relatively rare. Most software and most > projects I know of using MathML tend to use either presentation or > content markup, but not to go in so much for mixing. Probably the > most common approach in situations where content MathML is needed is > to use XSL to transform it to presentation MathML for display. But isn't this a good cause for most MathML-presentation implementations to provide no (or a poor) sub-term selection mechanism ? While in my copy-and-paste explorations, I could see little done in the area of sub-term selection. As I understand it, parallel markup is required if one wants to offer correct sub-term selection (i.e. a selection mechanism where the 2+3 is highlighted when the mouse as dragged over "2+"). paul
Received on Saturday, 17 April 2004 18:28:09 UTC