- From: Pepping, Simon (ELS) <S.Pepping@elsevier.nl>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 09:33:47 +0100
- To: "'David Carlisle'" <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Cc: www-math@w3.org
David Carlisle [mailto:davidc@nag.co.uk] wrote on 03 June 2003 13:35: > Simon, > > > > In the DTD mstyle can have the attribute %att-accentunder; (but not > > %att-accent;). I think it should be removed, since it is > not inheritable. > > In fact the DTD does specify the accent attribute (%att-accent;) is > allowed on mstyle, this is included in %att-opinfo; which is included > into mstyle's attribute list. > > att-accentunder does appear explictly in mstyle's attribute list as it > isn't in att-opinfo. > > We discussed your comment that these attributes should not be in the > DTD. The current settings are intentional and so we plan to keep > the DTD as it is in this case. > > The following explanation comes from Robert Minor, who I hope > won't mind > if I plagiarise his text from our internal discussion: > > > You can set anything except required attributes on mstyle. ... > > set the attribute just fine. > > As this is a last call comment could you confirm on this mailing list > whether or not you are happy with this resolution as we have > to document > the outcome of all last call comments, thanks. Thanks for the explanation. I agree with it. > Also, as far as I can tell this is the last of your DTD > comments in this > round to have been handled. If you think there is a message > that I have > missed and you haven't seen a reply please send me a reminder. Together with your previous message you have addressed my comments. Thanks. I am looking forward to seeing this edition become a Recommendation. With kind regards, Simon Pepping DTD Development and Maintenance Elsevier s.pepping@elsevier.com www.elsevier.com/locate/sgml
Received on Friday, 6 June 2003 04:41:45 UTC