- From: Andreas Strotmann <Strotmann@rrz.uni-koeln.de>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 15:02:52 +0200
- To: Stan Devitt <jsdevitt@stratumtek.com>
- CC: www-math@w3.org
Stan, this should apply to 'reln' / 'relation' instead of 'fn' / 'function' as well. -- Andreas Stan Devitt wrote: > > A number of examples in the current draft make use of type="fn". > All these should be read as type="function". But note that > type="fn" remains perfectly legal since any CDATA string > can be a type value. Apart from this there is no need to > change these examples. > > Romeo Anghelache wrote: > Hello, > >> I am a bit confused on the following issues and need some help: >> >> 1. Section 4.4.2.1 (apply) paragraph #4 states "if the object being >> applied is not already one of the elements known...it is treated as >> if it were the content of an fn element"; but fn is deprecated in >> favor of csymbol; then >> writing f(x) as >> <apply> >> <ci type="fn">f</ci>... >> is deprecated too, in my understanding (this example, <ci type="fn"> >> appears in a lot of places in the current spec) >> >> then what should one write, instead, >> <apply> >> <csymbol>f</csymbol> ? >> >> (If yes, then also the quoted phrase should be modified accordingly.) >
Received on Friday, 25 July 2003 09:03:08 UTC