Re: Java API for MATHML

Stan Devitt wrote:

>The content definitions for the arc trig functions
>used in appendix C were largely based on Abromovitz 
>and Stegun, Section 4.4  -- see, for example, 
>and more generally, were chosen to be consistent 
>with OpenMath.
Actually which version of Abromovitz and Stegun ?
I hear some noise that the definition of arccot has been changed between 
MathML having decided not to specify the definition domain... this may 
be a problem, or ??
(hence my request for any new system built with compatibility in mind to 
declare >precisely< its compatibility).


Received on Tuesday, 25 February 2003 18:44:04 UTC