- From: Leonardo B. Lopes <leo@iems.nwu.edu>
- Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 10:49:58 -0600 (CST)
- To: arul selva <selva_tct@yahoo.com.au>
- cc: www-math@w3.org
As I understand it, content markup is simpler, because it eliminates all formatting tags. Presentation markup can still be used to convey content (I think mathematica took this approach). If you are writing a parser for an application that does not need to worry about presentation, you can simplify your code and make it more elegant by using content markup. I also have the impression that presentation markup does not represent the objects in quite as convenient a grammar for computation applications. I don't know the specifics, because I basically do not deal with presentation markup. Cheers, Leo. On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, [iso-8859-1] arul selva wrote: > > i couldnt understand the purpose of Presentation > Markup and Content Markup.. what is the different > between those two, other than the tag. could you pls > explain ? > > > > http://movies.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Movies > - Vote for your nominees in our online Oscars pool. > > ======================================================================== Leonardo B. Lopes leo@iems.nwu.edu Ph.D. Student (847)491-8470 IEMS - Northwestern University http://www.iems.nwu.edu/~leo
Received on Monday, 4 March 2002 11:50:08 UTC