- From: William F Hammond <hammond@csc.albany.edu>
- Date: 18 Jul 2002 09:19:01 -0400
- To: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Cc: www-math@w3.org
David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> writes:
> > 3. The document must not have a "<!DOCTYPE" declaration.
>
> It can reference a DOCTYPE but mozilla won't read it.
I thought I saw IE get upset when DOCTYPE was present. Was that
an anomaly?
> 6. XSLT sheets must be served through HTTP as "application/xml".
> (See RFC 3023; "text/xsl" is not a registered content type.)
>
> yes mozilla is very fussy about this
> (it probably also accepts xml+xsl,
^^^^^^^
"text/xsl+xml" ??
> but IE doesn't so text/xml is best)
My reading of RFC 3023 leads me to conclude that since "normal people"
do not read want to look at style sheets, "application/xml" should be
used rather than "text/xml" for XSL/XSLT sheets. Moreover, the sheets
in /Math/XSL/ are served as "application/xml" (first noticed by me at
the meeting on June 30).
Is there any reason to prefer "text/xml"?
-- Bill
Received on Thursday, 18 July 2002 09:19:11 UTC