- From: Leonardo B. Lopes <leo@iems.nwu.edu>
- Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 21:16:22 -0500 (CDT)
- To: www-math@w3c.org
Dear Friends, About a year ago I asked around in this list and the OM lists about sparse matrices and vectors, which are central to my field of research. I also (thanks to generous support from WRI) attended the MathML conference in Urbana. The answer I got was basically that MathML was very strongly focused on K12 and that I shouldn't hold my breath. Well, it turns out that our community is now sufficiently organized that it looks like our standard communication format is actually going to become reality. Of course we would love to be able to use a MathML structure for representing our sparse objects. We would at least like to convey our structures in a way that MathML-aware applications would understand them. I searched the MathML 2.0 recommendation and found no reference to sparse objects. But apparently there are new features in Mathematica 4.0 to deal with sparse objects. So that gives me some more hope. Can someone be so kind as to in a few words describe what is going on in this area? Maybe someone from Wolfram? I would really appreciate it! Thanks! Leo. ======================================================================== Leonardo B. Lopes leo@iems.nwu.edu Ph.D. Student (847)491-8470 IEMS - Northwestern University http://www.iems.nwu.edu/~leo
Received on Thursday, 11 October 2001 22:16:23 UTC