- From: Stan Devitt <jsdevitt@stratumtek.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 13:48:44 -0500
- To: "Tobias Burnus" <tobias.burnus@physik.fu-berlin.de>, <www-math@w3.org>
- Cc: "Tobias Burnus" <tobias.burnus@physik.fu-berlin.de>, "Hans Hagen" <pragma@wxs.nl>
For sure, the discussion of "float" (floating-point) is inadequate.
The distinciton between float (floating-point) and real is supposed to be
one of representation. A real number is entered as a single
CDATA entry consisting of sign, digits and decimal point.
<cn type="real">+345.237</cn>
while a float is represented as a mantissa. and exponent
separated by a <sep/> entry. (see definition of cn in appendix C)
<cn type=:"floating-point" base="10">3.45237</sep>2</cn>
The distinction between "complex" and "complex-cartesian" comes up
in the context of identifiers. It is perfectly reasonable for someone to
know that an identifier stands for a complex number without knowing
what representation will be used for a particular instance of such
a number. Thus, the type "complex" is a mathematical type while the
types "complex-cartesian" and "complex-polar" are complex numbers
with a particular data representation.
Also, note that the possible type values is not a closed list.
Stan.
p.s. David C and I will be raising this with the working group and a more
authoritive statement will come from the working group
once we sort out the wording, etc.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tobias Burnus" <tobias.burnus@physik.fu-berlin.de>
To: <www-math@w3.org>
Cc: "Tobias Burnus" <tobias.burnus@physik.fu-berlin.de>; "Hans Hagen" <pragma@wxs.nl>
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 4:41 AM
Subject: W3-MathML questions: real/float, annotation, etc.
> Hi,
>
> while implementing MathML support for ConTeXt
> (http://www.w3.org/Math/#Software) we came across of something which
> seemed not to be very clear to us:
>
> a) It is not clear what the difference between "float" and "real.
> (I cannot find "float" anymore, maybe the PDF file is/was older)
> Also the difference between "complex" and "complex-cartesian" is not
> clear. (I guess there is none.)
>
> b) Are there any guidelines which <semantic/> presentations should be
> favoured and if it is allowed to have both xml-annotations MathML-Content
> and/or MathML-Presentation (the examples use only the latter).
>
> c) Do you know a list of the different presentations of mathematical
> operators (such as "n over k" which I cannot find in the HTML version).
>
> With warm regards,
>
> Tobias
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 14 March 2001 13:49:03 UTC