- From: Emmanuel Pietriga <emmanuel.pietriga@xrce.xerox.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 14:57:31 +0100
- To: www-math@w3.org
Some comments on the Content section of the test suite:
*rec-fn3
rendering is not consistent with code: code says (f+g)(z) and rendering
is (f+g)(x)
*rec-lambda?
the REC default rendering (uses the lambda symbol) is different from the
one provided here (uses the right arrow)
*rec-image1
in order to be consistent with the provided rendering, shouldn't the
code be like this:
<math>
<apply><eq/><apply><image/><sin/></apply><interval><cn>-1</cn><cn>1</cn></interval></apply>
</math>
instead of this:
<math>
<apply><eq/><apply><image/><apply><sin/><ci>x</ci></apply></apply><interval><cn>-1</cn><cn>1</cn></interval></apply>
</math>
(replace <sin/> by <apply><sin/><ci>x</ci></apply>)
*rec-piecewise1
rendering is not consistent with code: code says 0 if x<0 and rendering
is -x if x<0
*and1
the REC default rendering is different from the one provided here ("and"
instead of "^")
*rec-forall?
the REC default rendering is different from the one provided here (in
the REC, the variable is not rendered as a subscript of forall, and
there is the ":" sign which is missing here)
*limit? and tendsto?
-several inconsistencies between the REC and the test suite as far as
the rendering of tendsto is concerned when type is above
-the code is not consistent with the rendering in some examples (tends
to has an attribute type with value "above" and it is rendered as a
right arrow (should be down arrow))
*trigonometry8
the code given is only made of presentation markup
Emmanuel
--
emmanuel.pietriga@xrce.xerox.com | Xerox Research Centre Europe
Document Model and | 6, Chemin de Maupertuis
Transformation Technologies | 38240 Meylan, France
+33 4 76 61 50 32 | http://www.xrce.xerox.com
Received on Thursday, 14 December 2000 08:57:42 UTC