- From: Emmanuel Pietriga <emmanuel.pietriga@xrce.xerox.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 14:57:31 +0100
- To: www-math@w3.org
Some comments on the Content section of the test suite: *rec-fn3 rendering is not consistent with code: code says (f+g)(z) and rendering is (f+g)(x) *rec-lambda? the REC default rendering (uses the lambda symbol) is different from the one provided here (uses the right arrow) *rec-image1 in order to be consistent with the provided rendering, shouldn't the code be like this: <math> <apply><eq/><apply><image/><sin/></apply><interval><cn>-1</cn><cn>1</cn></interval></apply> </math> instead of this: <math> <apply><eq/><apply><image/><apply><sin/><ci>x</ci></apply></apply><interval><cn>-1</cn><cn>1</cn></interval></apply> </math> (replace <sin/> by <apply><sin/><ci>x</ci></apply>) *rec-piecewise1 rendering is not consistent with code: code says 0 if x<0 and rendering is -x if x<0 *and1 the REC default rendering is different from the one provided here ("and" instead of "^") *rec-forall? the REC default rendering is different from the one provided here (in the REC, the variable is not rendered as a subscript of forall, and there is the ":" sign which is missing here) *limit? and tendsto? -several inconsistencies between the REC and the test suite as far as the rendering of tendsto is concerned when type is above -the code is not consistent with the rendering in some examples (tends to has an attribute type with value "above" and it is rendered as a right arrow (should be down arrow)) *trigonometry8 the code given is only made of presentation markup Emmanuel -- emmanuel.pietriga@xrce.xerox.com | Xerox Research Centre Europe Document Model and | 6, Chemin de Maupertuis Transformation Technologies | 38240 Meylan, France +33 4 76 61 50 32 | http://www.xrce.xerox.com
Received on Thursday, 14 December 2000 08:57:42 UTC