- From: Vic Bancroft <bancroft@america.net>
- Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 09:40:47 -0500
- To: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadentplace.org.uk>
- CC: Arthur Smith <apsmith@aps.org>, libwww w3c <www-lib@w3.org>
Another email that did not seem to reach the lists.
Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Please note the list of headers at the top of the sample code I gave.
>
>On a POSIX-compliant system you should be including all of these:
>
>#include <sys/types.h>
>#include <dirent.h>
>#include <limits.h>
>#include <stddef.h>
>#include <unistd.h>
>
>It may be necessary to make some of them conditional on autoconf macros
>in order to support older Unix variants.
>
>
Of the list the only missing one was stddef.h . . .
Index: configure.ac
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/libwww/configure.ac,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -r1.5 configure.ac
248a249
> AC_CHECK_HEADERS(stddef.h)
We check for it having been detected with a modififcation to the
wwwsys.html,
Index: Library/src/wwwsys.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/libwww/Library/src/wwwsys.html,v
retrieving revision 2.127
diff -r2.127 wwwsys.html
747a748,752
> /* stdef.h */
> #ifdef HAVE_STDDEF_H
> #include <stddef.h>
> #endif
>
Of course, one has to run autoheader to get the appropriate fragment
into wwwconf.h.in . . .
Does this fix the borken compile under Solaris ? Does it break anything
else ?
In any case, here is the round of revisions,
ChangeLog new revision: 1.54;
configure.ac new revision: 1.6;
wwwsys.html new revision: 2.128 ;
done.
more,
l8r,
v
--
"The future is here. It's just not evenly distributed yet."
-- William Gibson, quoted by Whitfield Diffie
Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2006 14:41:15 UTC