Re: w3c-libwww-5.2.8-7 bug report

> Hmmm... Don't want to get into a long drawn out discussion on this but
> I don't get why you "concluded" that "i = ++i;" is undefined in K&R "C".
> I have the Kernighan an Ritchie book sitting in front of me and it does
> describe what would happen with the expression "x = ++i;" and "x =
> i++;".

 And what about "i = i++;" ?

 Would you increment "i" before or after the assignment ?

    -JCT-

Received on Wednesday, 30 January 2002 09:26:08 UTC