Re: w3c-libwww-5.2.8-7 bug report

> To be even less scientific (but more the engineer I actually am), I think
> the most potent argument for ignoring those warnings is still: "You're not
> using gopher.  Or PICS.".

So what ?

The point is that I've found a few places where some C code doesn't
quite conform to the ISO C language standard.

This is simple compile time stuff, about sticking to the language
standard, not tricky run time behaviour.

You can fix it if you like. I'm happy either way.

Regards

dcb

Received on Wednesday, 30 January 2002 09:26:00 UTC