- From: Jose Kahan <jose.kahan@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 09:40:17 +0100
- To: Phil Nitschke <Phil.Nitschke@youramigo.com>
- Cc: Michel Philip <mphilip@infovista.com>, "'www-lib@w3.org'" <www-lib@w3.org>
Moving to source forge is not the problem. The problem is having more people maintain the code. I have proposed opening the CVS write access in the past and haven't had any appliant. Moving to sourceforge won't solve this problem. How about you Phil? Do you want to become a maintainer of libwww? I added this patch, but hadn't commited it yet, as I was offline. -jose On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 10:56:52AM +1030, Phil Nitschke wrote: > > I noted the same problem in a post on November 6 2001. > > I also noted various other patches that were needed. > > The total lack of maintenance of this code is very disappointing, > considering the number of people around the world that wish to use it. > > Perhaps someone out there will consider moving the source to sourceforge > so that interested parties can have blatant bugs fixed once more?
Received on Friday, 18 January 2002 03:42:34 UTC