- From: Michel Philip <philipm@altern.org>
- Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2001 01:09:38 +0100
- To: www-lib@w3.org
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: HTAnchors lifetime Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 10:11:22 +0200 From: "Cesare Pietra" <cesare.pietra@netikos.com> Organization: netikos To: "Michel Philip" <philipm@altern.org> References: <002b01c15b09$229f67f0$150516ac@netikos.com> <3BD5086F.E86C02B5@altern.org> Unfortunately I never can tell for sure if all the submitted requests have been completed at a given time. (Can you suggest for any counter of pending Requests inside libwww?) I'm passing to the Library more and more requests as the need arises from an asynchronous source, and it should be desirable if I could delete Anchors bound to a specific Request as it terminates. The hyperdocuments my applications is going to retreive are poor html plain-text pages without any embedded links. So I wonder if Anchors are really usefull at all for my application. In addition, I have to say (if it can somehow help you to understand my problem) I'm using a Jen Megger's patch of HTHost.c module to be able to open more then one socket connection to the same host. Yes I read everything about pipelining and performance issues, but I'm doing like that in order to avoid the remote web server to slow down the entire work invoking a CGI at a time. This way I try exploiting parallelism in executions of CGI themselves. Maybe it implies other unsuspected dependancies between Requests and Anchors? Tips are welcome. Thanks in advance, Cesare
Received on Wednesday, 31 October 2001 18:59:11 UTC