- From: Desrochers, Gary <Gary.Desrochers@fmr.com>
- Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2000 07:48:29 -0400
- To: "'jose.kahan@w3.org'" <jose.kahan@w3.org>
- Cc: www-lib@w3.org
I think I have a couple more bug fix/memory leak patches that I would like to submit and I will try to get them out next week. -----Original Message----- From: jose.kahan@w3.org [mailto:jose.kahan@w3.org] Sent: Friday, June 09, 2000 6:44 AM To: jose.kahan@w3.org Cc: www-lib@w3.org Subject: Re: Some facts and questions about libwww-ssl In our previous episode, jose.kahan@w3.org said: > > The things I don't know: > > - were libwww and libwww-ssl always distributed separately? > - are there some test programs somewhere, which I have missed? > > I think I'll keep both zones separate. Of course, the process can be improved, > but at least we'll get a first version out. > I finally found out the answer to my own two questions. The libwww-ssl code was originally found under Library/src/SSL and there was a test program called wwwssl in that directory. Yesterday, I merged back the SSL code into libwww and changed the configure and Makefile as needed and put the example under Library/Examples. It compiles and works out nicely. I'm testing some final details. If I don't find anything unusual, I'll commit the code to CVS and make a distribution tar file, so that people can help testing it. I propose to call this distribution 5.2.10b (unless someone has a better name). I'll continue adding patches next week and will update the changelog. Any comments? :) -Jose
Received on Friday, 9 June 2000 07:48:40 UTC