Re: Valid HTML

• From: Paul Prescod <papresco@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
• Date: Sun, 22 Sep 1996 09:47:19 -0400
• To: <www-lib@w3.org>
• Message-Id: <1.5.4.32.19960922134719.00d47044@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>

At 11:00 PM 9/21/96 -0700, Don Park wrote:
>Daniel,
>
>I agree that we should all encourage use of valid HTML.  However,
>developers of HTML consuming application and tools, whether they work for
>Microsoft or a hole-in-the-wall, do not have the luxury to spit back bad
>HTML pages.  Only the developers of HTML producing applications and tools
>have the ability to improve the situation.

HTML consumers do have the option of _flagging_ incorrect HTML. If
validation were easier and more ubiquitous, it would be done more often.

 Paul Prescod

Received on Sunday, 22 September 1996 09:52:30 UTC