W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-jigsaw@w3.org > January to February 2001

Re: More on PUT corruption

From: Michael Zick <mszick@altavista.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 14:18:55 GMT
Message-ID: <20010227.14185527@mis.configured.host>
To: Bob Schader <rschader@product-des.com>
Cc: Jigsaw List <www-jigsaw@w3.org>
A suggestion...
Have you tried doing a "PUT" to "localhost:xxx" ?  That is, the data 
being transferred would never leave the physical bounds of the machine, 
but should use the same JDK/TCP/IP/OS paths of an external connection.
Of course, you would have to have a local HTTP server running – so you 
might have to proc up the Jigsaw server on each of the two machines 
during the testing so that your could "PUT" to yourself.


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

On 2/27/01, 06:44:57, Bob Schader <rschader@product-des.com> wrote 
regarding More on PUT corruption:

> Found out today that the problem I am having seems to
> be because of something on my home system. I did not
> have the problem at all at work, everything worked as
> it was supposed to.

> So, then I found that my JDK at home was an older 1.3
> Release candidate, so I un-installed it and installed
> the same JDK as on my work computer, which is 1.3.0_01.

> So now the only difference I can tell between the 2
> systems is that one is Windows 2000 (the one that works),
> and the other one is WinNT 4.0 SP 6. I have found I even
> get the corruption using Winie's JWPut command line
> interface to upload a file now.

> I have also noticed that I also have some graphics refresh
> errors on my swing components, especially the menu bar,
> even with the new JDK installed.

> I see to actually be getting more errors using jwput
> than my own program, even after upgrading the JDK and
> rebooting. Funny, the connection at work is a full
> 100Mb, you'd think the faster transfer might be more
> prone to such errors! Yet the slower, 128Kb connection
> is the one giving me problems!

> Since this only appears to happen to me when trying
> to use the w3c client lib, is there some way I can tell
> it to do more error checking or something? Until this is
> resolved, I huess it's back to using native libcurls
> to do my uploads, as it hasn't failed yet.

> Bob Schader
Received on Tuesday, 27 February 2001 09:19:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:41:29 UTC