- From: Ingmar Krusch <nacht@novedia.de>
- Date: Mon, 6 Sep 1999 16:09:52 +0200
- To: "Jigsaw Mailingliste" <www-jigsaw@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <002401bef871$7cd74c30$122aa8c0@eagle.novedia.de>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hoi Daniel > > This is really too bad, our customer trusts the W3, but dislikes > > 3rd party developers in this regard. > > The problem is purely legal. W3C is hosted partly in the USA > where exporting cryptographic software (or software with > cryptographic hooks) is forbidden. All out FTP servers are mirrors > of each-other and some of them are in the USA. > In that specific case relying on a third party to provide and > distribute cryptographic extensions to W3C software is simpler. > You will note that this scheme is adopted for most free software > distributed from the USA. > Since the Jigsaw team is actually based in France it could be > possible to have a separate distribution locally not mirrored in > the USA and containing the crypto code, but such a process would > put more burden on the developper team, Hmmm, I see. This would also be an issue if a platform that comes with a webbrowser that supports SSL would be imported into the US, right? Thanx Ingmar -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.1 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com> iQA/AwUBN9O9ILKzgXyc3RmAEQJzagCg5Vvl8CNQcQdYelZ6zCnnmm3OjAkAnRye 305znnQE6mkyV7dSUqFta2yp =SfJc -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Attachments
- application/octet-stream attachment: Ingmar_Krusch.vcf
Received on Monday, 18 October 1999 10:10:28 UTC