- From: Anselm Baird_Smith <abaird@www43.inria.fr>
- Date: Wed, 16 Apr 1997 19:05:24 +0200 (MET DST)
- To: mark@intraspect.com
- Cc: www-jigsaw@w3.org
Mark Friedman writes: > > --------------F4CC038794437B297FE7F0CD > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > My concerns have to do with quality, robustness, performance, and > timeliness. The current design is good enough for us right now. We were > depending on having that design implemented in an industrial strength > Jigsaw server. Does the current alpha5 (or your current snapshot) meet > your standards for the above criteria? If so, then I guess it's just a > question of renaming it 1.0 final. I guess that would be it (1.0alpha5 == 1.0 final) > What I would not like to see is creeping featuritis or creeping > designitis delaying a final quality release. I might have been unclear about it, but really this change doesn't involve any *design* change (ie stores, resources, filters and friends will remain there). Well, I guess the question would then be what "design" mean ;-) Anselm.
Received on Wednesday, 16 April 1997 13:05:35 UTC