- From: Joseph M. Futrelle <futrelle@ncsa.uiuc.edu>
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 1997 13:53:37 -0500 (CDT)
- To: www-jigsaw@w3.org
Forwarded message: > From www-jigsaw-request@w3.org Tue Apr 15 05:54:01 1997 > Resent-Date: Tue, 15 Apr 1997 06:50:04 -0400 > Resent-Message-Id: <199704151050.GAA23073@www19.w3.org> > Date: Tue, 15 Apr 97 05:48:42 cst > From: "Bill Woods" <bwoods@ccsmtp.memc.com> > To: www-jigsaw@w3.org > Subject: Jigsaw and Jeeves > Resent-From: www-jigsaw@w3.org > X-Mailing-List: <www-jigsaw@w3.org> archive/latest/1253 > X-Loop: www-jigsaw@w3.org > Sender: www-jigsaw-request@w3.org > Resent-Sender: www-jigsaw-request@w3.org > Precedence: list > > > Anslem, > > I don't know if this has been asked before but how would you compare > Jigsaw and Jeeves (Suns Java based web server)? I was at JavaOne and got a pretty obnoxious answer from some marketing guy about how much faster Jeeves is than Jigsaw. I think it's worth pointing out while we're on the subject that www.javasoft.com is running Apache -- which is a vote of no confidence for the performance estimates they gave at JavaOne. There is no comparison, in NCSA's opinion, between Jigsaw and Jeeves because the source code for Jeeves is not available and nothing except the servlet API is public. The servlet API is too small a sandbox for the kind of development we're doing. -- Joe Futrelle HTTP Server Development, Joule/Hacksaw Group National Center for Supercomputing Applications futrelle@ncsa.uiuc.edu (217) 265-0296
Received on Tuesday, 15 April 1997 14:53:46 UTC