- From: Bernard Leach <leachbj@cs.latrobe.edu.au>
- Date: Wed, 04 Sep 1996 11:09:27 +1000
- To: www-jigsaw@w3.org
Anselm Baird-Smith wrote: > Are you familiar with the way Jigsaw's indexer work ? WHat happens is > the following: when a directory resource is queried for an URL it > doesn't know about, it checks to see if an appropriate file exsist. If > so, it hands it out to the resource indexer, that will return a > suitable resource for that file (depending on extensions, if this is a > file, or directory templates if it is a directory). You make this sound quite simple but from what I've seen in the source code its not so! > One thing I could do (let me know if this would help you), is the > following: make the ResourceIndexer an interface, and make the current > resource indexer a SampleResourceIndexer, implementing that > interface. I would then add a new property to Jigsaw in order to know > what indexer class it should use as an indexer. > > If this makes sense (BTW to anyone) then the ResourceIndexer interface > would probably look like: > > public interface ResourceIndexer { > public Resource createDirectoryResource(File directory > , String name > , Hashtable defs); > > public Resource createFileResource(File file > , String name > , Hashtable defs); > > } > > The File parameter is the "object" to be indexed (it has to be refered > to by something, in this case a File instance). > The name is the identifier for the resource to be created (can be > different from the file's name) > The defs hashtable is a set of default attribute values for the > resource to be created. > > If this would be of any use to anyone let me know. Note that you could > implement such an interface, and "chain" indexer together. Say you > implement the FancyResourceIndexer, if it doesn't know how to create a > resource, it could forward the call to a "default" > SampleResourceIndexer instance. This sounds useful to me! I am interested in extending resource indexing so that indexes would be replicated between a group of servers. To do this I would need to know when resources were created and deleted. I've looked at adding this to the current indexing mechanism but been buried under a pile of classes and interfaces!! > I think I could find the time to make that change, but before going > further, I want to make sure it will be usefull to anyone. So let me > know. > > Anselm. -- Bernard Leach La Trobe Uni Melbourne Australia leachbj@cs.latrobe.edu.au http://www.cs.latrobe.edu.au/~leachbj/
Received on Thursday, 5 September 1996 12:40:35 UTC