- From: Anselm Baird_Smith <abaird@www43.inria.fr>
- Date: Fri, 20 Dec 1996 16:18:33 +0100 (MET)
- To: www-jigsaw@w3.org
Unfortunatelly, I realized a few days ago that I had some bugs in 1.0alpha3 resource pickling (filtered resource pickling to be more precise). Fixing that bug (which I really have to do) implies that 1.0alpha3 configuration is not going to be strickly backward compatible, however... I am now writing a program that takes a 1.0alpha3 Jigsaw configuration, and upgrade it to 1.0alpha4 (or 1.0beta, hopefully). This program will be run whenever you start Jigsaw/1.0beta against a Jigsaw/1.0alpha3 configuration (so everything will be transparent to normal users), provided appropriate command line options are specified (this will not be black magic). Now, I am facing the following problem: the impact of changing the FilteredResource pickling format may have some (bad) interactions with people who have written new Jigsaw extensions. After deep thinking, the *only* case that will cause trouble is if the extension resource redefines one of the following methods (inherited from w3c.jigsaw.resource.AttributeHolder): public void pickle(DataOutputStream out) throws IOException; static public AttributeHolder unpickle (DataInputStream in, Hashtable defs) throws IOException; public AttributeHolder unpickleInstance(DataInputStream in, Hashtable defs) throws IOException; As an example, in the whole Jigsaw source code, there is only one (perhaps two) resources that do override one of these methods. I would be heavily interested in knowing if anyone here has written a resource that overrides one of them (please send me personal email, and put "picklebug" in the subject line). Thanks, Anselm
Received on Friday, 20 December 1996 10:18:21 UTC