- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 13:59:30 +0100
- To: WWW-isaviz@w3.org
I really do not want to appear as nagging... I just like having a tool like that, and I used it for some of the things I have to do. But then, problems arise... So here is the latest: - I would love to be able to import another isv file, not only an rdf file. Here is what I need it for: I use an RDF vocabulary which is a bit large. I have therefore created a project, typed in all the properties in their own namespaces. I then store an empty project that way. When I have to create a concrete RDF, the only way I can do it now is to start with the empty one I created above, add nodes and links, and store the project as a separate file. But if I wanted to have several of those empty projects, I would like to import them... I tried, it did not work. - during editing, the tip of the arrowheads should touch the boundary of a resource. Currently the full arrowhead is inside the object. - some manual editing features would be nice (I know it is extra work...). Eg, aligning a set of objects vertically, horizontally, distributing them, etc. Adding some attributes to some of the geometric elements (eg, colour) would also be great... - I experienced a problem when I rerun a graph through dot. I am warned that the geometry will change, and that there is no return: fair enough. However, some other things change, too, like: - the namespace prefix I had chosen for my own predicates (it simply disappears) - all resources, previously set as 'URI' are flipped to 'ID' - the (nice) display prefix flag on namespaces on the right get all unset - zoom in seems to hit a limit prematurely. I am not sure how, but sometimes I cannot zoom in any more although it would really make sense. As if the original way of creating the graph was the limit, but I am not sure - the property browser display is strange: it leaves a very large vertical space around each item - the use for abbreviated RDF syntax is great but I wonder whether there should not be a way of a finer control. If one has very deep graphs, that will create a very deeply nested XML file. For readability, I might want to 'break' this somehow, and put a resource back to the top level (but only that one). Would be nice to be able to control that. - (I might be wrong on this one!) the current system does not allow me to use the same literal twice as an object of a predicate (as the target of an arrow). On the other hand, as far as I remember, sirpac generates a graph with a shared node there, I guess implicitly meaning a replication of the literal. It is very handy if one has, for example, a literal 'true' or 'false', because it reduces the visual clutter of the graph. With isaviz, I may have to repeat the literal as many times as I want to use it... Ivan ------ Ivan Herman Head of Offices, World Wide Web Consortium C/o Dutch Office of W3C at CWI Kruislaan 413, 1098SJ Amsterdam The Netherlands tel: +31 20 5924163 fax: +31 20 5924312 mobile: +33 6 0887 2517 URI: http://www.w3.org/People/all#ivan
Received on Tuesday, 19 March 2002 07:57:12 UTC