- From: r12a <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 16:07:20 +0100
- To: www-international@w3.org
- Message-ID: <ca96687f-a4b2-bd4c-b2f3-5e87a89d815f@w3.org>
https://www.w3.org/2020/04/16-i18n-minutes.html text version follows: - DRAFT - Internationalization Working Group Teleconference 16 Apr 2020 [2]Agenda [2] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2020Apr/0010.html Attendees Present addison, atsushi, fuqiao, fsasaki, Bert, richard, JcK Regrets Chair Addison Phillips Scribe addison Contents * [3]Topics 1. [4]Agenda and Minutes 2. [5]Action Items 3. [6]Info Share 4. [7]RADAR Review 5. [8]Issue 871 (Unicode normalization) 6. [9]Locale scope proposal discussion 7. [10]Issues Resolution 8. [11]AOB? * [12]Summary of Action Items * [13]Summary of Resolutions __________________________________________________________ trackbot, prepare teleconference <agendabot> clear agenda <scribe> scribenick: addison Agenda and Minutes Action Items [14]https://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/open [14] https://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/open action-886? <trackbot> action-886 -- Felix Sasaki to Create github issue to discuss rdf bcp47 issue in i18n-discuss repo -- due 2020-04-16 -- OPEN <trackbot> [15]https://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/886 [15] https://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/886 close action-886 <trackbot> Closed action-886. felix: should discuss whether to invite people to respond to this action-887 <trackbot> action-887 -- Fuqiao Xue to Request a slot to discuss generic font family rules in next css virtual f2f -- due 2020-04-16 -- OPEN <trackbot> [16]https://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/887 [16] https://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/887 close action-887 <trackbot> Closed action-887. Info Share fuqiao: font-fingerprinting... <xfq> [17]https://github.com/w3cping/font-anti-fingerprinting [17] https://github.com/w3cping/font-anti-fingerprinting <xfq> [18]https://github.com/w3cping/font-fp-protection-browser-hinti ng [18] https://github.com/w3cping/font-fp-protection-browser-hinting fuqiao: there are 3 proposals on preventing by default <xfq> [19]https://github.com/tabatkins/proposal-local-font-access [19] https://github.com/tabatkins/proposal-local-font-access fuqiao: links here ... encourage people to read after the meeting ... provide feedback addison: will they discuss before our next telecon? fuqiao: not in their agenda for next week yet <scribe> ACTION: addison: remind WG to read font fingerprinting proposals for next telecon <trackbot> Created ACTION-888 - Remind wg to read font fingerprinting proposals for next telecon [on Addison Phillips - due 2020-04-23]. RADAR Review [20]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-request/projects/1 [20] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-request/projects/1 [21]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-international/2020 AprJun/0021.html [21] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-international/2020AprJun/0021.html review of changes to HTML by 22 May <scribe> ACTION: addison: add HTML to review radar, respond to xiaoqian <trackbot> Created ACTION-889 - Add html to review radar, respond to xiaoqian [on Addison Phillips - due 2020-04-23]. Issue 871 (Unicode normalization) [22]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/871 [22] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/871 richard: my recollection was that unicode normalization was only part of it ... talking about identifiers or general text addison: it's a prohibition of any normalizatio, but example is for cue IDs richard: add a short para "by the way, rules are different for ids vs. normal text, please clarify what this pertains to" addison: ok ... do we want to write some canned specdev text for groups to use? ... would we republish charmod, add to specdev, or both? <scribe> ACTION: addison: propose a draft of "health warning" text for specdev <trackbot> Created ACTION-890 - Propose a draft of "health warning" text for specdev [on Addison Phillips - due 2020-04-23]. addison: forward with additional para richard proposed? <xfq> +1 <Bert> +1 richard: +1 <fsasaki> +1 <scribe> ACTION: addison: forward comment in issue 871 <trackbot> Created ACTION-891 - Forward comment in issue 871 [on Addison Phillips - due 2020-04-23]. Locale scope proposal discussion [23]https://www.w3.org/International/wiki/LocaleScopeProposal20 200408 [23] https://www.w3.org/International/wiki/LocaleScopeProposal20200408 jck: 2nd para bothers me because of cldr and ecma402 richard: "encourage support over..." <Zakim> Bert, you wanted to ask what the last sentence means ("better support for page author control") addison: need to clarify that sentence and perhaps add an example [24]http://www.org/TR/ltli [24] http://www.org/TR/ltli <fsasaki> +1 to revising the document <Bert> +1, with the comments we heard today <atsushi> +1 <JcK> +1, yes +1 <xfq> +1 <r12a> +1 Issues Resolution [25]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2020M ar/0005.html [25] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2020Mar/0005.html addison: propose we close all in the "close" list atsushi: summary 3 is propose to close also [26]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/400 [26] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/400 unraised issue RESOLUTION: close #400 [27]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/473 [27] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/473 [28]https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1789 [28] https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1789 atsushi: rejected by css richard: don't think I'll win that argument ... it's a "needs resolution" issue, so should reply <scribe> ACTION: richard: reply to issue 473 (css issue 1789) as part of closing <trackbot> Created ACTION-892 - Reply to issue 473 (css issue 1789) as part of closing [on Richard Ishida - due 2020-04-23]. [29]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/508 [29] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/508 [30]https://github.com/w3c/dnt/issues/62 [30] https://github.com/w3c/dnt/issues/62 atsushi: think "needs resolution" is our misunderstanding <JcK> @richard: For the record, I think you are right -- decimal values should either be discouraged in these contexts or more precisely specified. But I agree that you (and we) are going to lose the argument <atsushi> [31]https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5234#page-13 [31] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5234#page-13 <scribe> ACTION: addison: close dnt issue 62 (our 508) with a comment <trackbot> Created ACTION-893 - Close dnt issue 62 (our 508) with a comment [on Addison Phillips - due 2020-04-23]. we'll start next time with sumary section 2 AOB? atsushi: simple-ruby in jlreq ... made update to japanese version ... expect to close discussion in 1 week or so richard: wanted to mention Summary of Action Items [NEW] ACTION: addison: add HTML to review radar, respond to xiaoqian [NEW] ACTION: addison: close dnt issue 62 (our 508) with a comment [NEW] ACTION: addison: forward comment in issue 871 [NEW] ACTION: addison: propose a draft of "health warning" text for specdev [NEW] ACTION: addison: remind WG to read font fingerprinting proposals for next telecon [NEW] ACTION: richard: reply to issue 473 (css issue 1789) as part of closing Summary of Resolutions 1. [32]close #400 [End of minutes]
Received on Thursday, 16 April 2020 15:07:26 UTC