- From: r12a <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 16:07:20 +0100
- To: www-international@w3.org
- Message-ID: <ca96687f-a4b2-bd4c-b2f3-5e87a89d815f@w3.org>
https://www.w3.org/2020/04/16-i18n-minutes.html
text version follows:
- DRAFT -
Internationalization Working Group Teleconference
16 Apr 2020
[2]Agenda
[2] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2020Apr/0010.html
Attendees
Present
addison, atsushi, fuqiao, fsasaki, Bert, richard, JcK
Regrets
Chair
Addison Phillips
Scribe
addison
Contents
* [3]Topics
1. [4]Agenda and Minutes
2. [5]Action Items
3. [6]Info Share
4. [7]RADAR Review
5. [8]Issue 871 (Unicode normalization)
6. [9]Locale scope proposal discussion
7. [10]Issues Resolution
8. [11]AOB?
* [12]Summary of Action Items
* [13]Summary of Resolutions
__________________________________________________________
trackbot, prepare teleconference
<agendabot> clear agenda
<scribe> scribenick: addison
Agenda and Minutes
Action Items
[14]https://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/open
[14] https://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/open
action-886?
<trackbot> action-886 -- Felix Sasaki to Create github issue to
discuss rdf bcp47 issue in i18n-discuss repo -- due 2020-04-16
-- OPEN
<trackbot>
[15]https://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/886
[15] https://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/886
close action-886
<trackbot> Closed action-886.
felix: should discuss whether to invite people to respond to
this
action-887
<trackbot> action-887 -- Fuqiao Xue to Request a slot to
discuss generic font family rules in next css virtual f2f --
due 2020-04-16 -- OPEN
<trackbot>
[16]https://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/887
[16] https://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/887
close action-887
<trackbot> Closed action-887.
Info Share
fuqiao: font-fingerprinting...
<xfq> [17]https://github.com/w3cping/font-anti-fingerprinting
[17] https://github.com/w3cping/font-anti-fingerprinting
<xfq>
[18]https://github.com/w3cping/font-fp-protection-browser-hinti
ng
[18] https://github.com/w3cping/font-fp-protection-browser-hinting
fuqiao: there are 3 proposals on preventing by default
<xfq>
[19]https://github.com/tabatkins/proposal-local-font-access
[19] https://github.com/tabatkins/proposal-local-font-access
fuqiao: links here
... encourage people to read after the meeting
... provide feedback
addison: will they discuss before our next telecon?
fuqiao: not in their agenda for next week yet
<scribe> ACTION: addison: remind WG to read font fingerprinting
proposals for next telecon
<trackbot> Created ACTION-888 - Remind wg to read font
fingerprinting proposals for next telecon [on Addison Phillips
- due 2020-04-23].
RADAR Review
[20]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-request/projects/1
[20] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-request/projects/1
[21]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-international/2020
AprJun/0021.html
[21] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-international/2020AprJun/0021.html
review of changes to HTML by 22 May
<scribe> ACTION: addison: add HTML to review radar, respond to
xiaoqian
<trackbot> Created ACTION-889 - Add html to review radar,
respond to xiaoqian [on Addison Phillips - due 2020-04-23].
Issue 871 (Unicode normalization)
[22]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/871
[22] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/871
richard: my recollection was that unicode normalization was
only part of it
... talking about identifiers or general text
addison: it's a prohibition of any normalizatio, but example is
for cue IDs
richard: add a short para "by the way, rules are different for
ids vs. normal text, please clarify what this pertains to"
addison: ok
... do we want to write some canned specdev text for groups to
use?
... would we republish charmod, add to specdev, or both?
<scribe> ACTION: addison: propose a draft of "health warning"
text for specdev
<trackbot> Created ACTION-890 - Propose a draft of "health
warning" text for specdev [on Addison Phillips - due
2020-04-23].
addison: forward with additional para richard proposed?
<xfq> +1
<Bert> +1
richard: +1
<fsasaki> +1
<scribe> ACTION: addison: forward comment in issue 871
<trackbot> Created ACTION-891 - Forward comment in issue 871
[on Addison Phillips - due 2020-04-23].
Locale scope proposal discussion
[23]https://www.w3.org/International/wiki/LocaleScopeProposal20
200408
[23] https://www.w3.org/International/wiki/LocaleScopeProposal20200408
jck: 2nd para bothers me because of cldr and ecma402
richard: "encourage support over..."
<Zakim> Bert, you wanted to ask what the last sentence means
("better support for page author control")
addison: need to clarify that sentence and perhaps add an
example
[24]http://www.org/TR/ltli
[24] http://www.org/TR/ltli
<fsasaki> +1 to revising the document
<Bert> +1, with the comments we heard today
<atsushi> +1
<JcK> +1, yes
+1
<xfq> +1
<r12a> +1
Issues Resolution
[25]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2020M
ar/0005.html
[25] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2020Mar/0005.html
addison: propose we close all in the "close" list
atsushi: summary 3 is propose to close also
[26]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/400
[26] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/400
unraised issue
RESOLUTION: close #400
[27]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/473
[27] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/473
[28]https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1789
[28] https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1789
atsushi: rejected by css
richard: don't think I'll win that argument
... it's a "needs resolution" issue, so should reply
<scribe> ACTION: richard: reply to issue 473 (css issue 1789)
as part of closing
<trackbot> Created ACTION-892 - Reply to issue 473 (css issue
1789) as part of closing [on Richard Ishida - due 2020-04-23].
[29]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/508
[29] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/508
[30]https://github.com/w3c/dnt/issues/62
[30] https://github.com/w3c/dnt/issues/62
atsushi: think "needs resolution" is our misunderstanding
<JcK> @richard: For the record, I think you are right --
decimal values should either be discouraged in these contexts
or more precisely specified. But I agree that you (and we) are
going to lose the argument
<atsushi> [31]https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5234#page-13
[31] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5234#page-13
<scribe> ACTION: addison: close dnt issue 62 (our 508) with a
comment
<trackbot> Created ACTION-893 - Close dnt issue 62 (our 508)
with a comment [on Addison Phillips - due 2020-04-23].
we'll start next time with sumary section 2
AOB?
atsushi: simple-ruby in jlreq
... made update to japanese version
... expect to close discussion in 1 week or so
richard: wanted to mention
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: addison: add HTML to review radar, respond to
xiaoqian
[NEW] ACTION: addison: close dnt issue 62 (our 508) with a
comment
[NEW] ACTION: addison: forward comment in issue 871
[NEW] ACTION: addison: propose a draft of "health warning" text
for specdev
[NEW] ACTION: addison: remind WG to read font fingerprinting
proposals for next telecon
[NEW] ACTION: richard: reply to issue 473 (css issue 1789) as
part of closing
Summary of Resolutions
1. [32]close #400
[End of minutes]
Received on Thursday, 16 April 2020 15:07:26 UTC