RE: Subject: REQUEST for preliminary review: Verifiable Credentials Data Model 1.0 [I18N-ACTION-741]

Hello Verifiable Claims WG,

Thanks for requesting a review. We’re very happy to hear from you early in the process. I have added your request to our Review Radar [1]. We should be able to send any initial comments within your requested 60-day window.

Have you tried to complete a self-review [3]?

Our normal process will result in our filing issues in your github, as you requested. If you haven’t already, please provide the label ‘i18n-comment’ in your repo so that we can automatically track progress in our digests [2]. Note that issues in our repo will have the label ‘verifiable-claims’.

If you have any questions or concerns, please don’t hesitate to reach out.

Regards (for I18N),

Addison

[1] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/projects/1

[2] https://www.w3.org/International/review-request#labels

[3] https://www.w3.org/International/techniques/developing-specs?collapse


Addison Phillips
Principal SDE, I18N Architect (Amazon)
Chair (W3C I18N WG)

Internationalization is not a feature.
It is an architecture.



From: Daniel Burnett [mailto:danielcburnett@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2018 6:06 AM
To: www-international@w3.org
Cc: Matt Stone <mstone@stonecover.com>; Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>; Dave Longley <dlongley@digitalbazaar.com>; Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
Subject: Subject: REQUEST for preliminary review: Verifiable Credentials Data Model 1.0

Hi,

The Verifiable Claims Working Group's one standards-track specification, "Verifiable Credentials Data Model 1.0", is beyond First Public Working Draft but not yet ready for Candidate Recommendation.

We would like to ask for any early comments you might have on our admittedly incomplete specification, in an attempt to address any major issues earlier rather than later.

Would your group (or some members of your group) be willing to give the document an informal read-through?  We are looking for comments within approximately a 60-day timeframe if possible.

The best place for comments is directly in our GitHub repo [1] as new issues, but comments sent to our comments mailing list [2] work as well.  Comments on either the (stable) dated draft [3] or the live Editor's Draft [4] are fine, whichever is easiest for you.

If you need anything else from us first, please don't hesitate to contact the chairs directly.


Thank you,

Dan Burnett and Matt Stone, Co-chairs, Verifiable Claims Working Group

CC: Specification editors


[1] GitHub repo:  https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model

[2] Mailing list:  public-vc-comments@w3.org<mailto:public-vc-comments@w3.org>
[3] Most recent dated (fixed) draft:  https://w3c.github.io/vc-data-model/WD/2018-07-18/

[4] Tip of tree editor's draft:  https://w3c.github.io/vc-data-model/