- From: r12a <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 17:39:28 +0000
- To: www International <www-international@w3.org>
https://www.w3.org/2018/02/22-i18n-minutes.html text snapshot: – DRAFT – Internationalization Working Group Teleconference 22 February 2018 [2]IRC log [2] https://www.w3.org/2018/02/22-i18n-irc Attendees Present Bert, JcK, Katy, r12a Regrets Addison, Fuquiao Chair - Scribe katy Contents * [3]Meeting Minutes 1. [4]Action Items 2. [5]Info Share 3. [6]IMSC character sets 4. [7]More infoshare 5. [8]Closing TTML Issues 6. [9]Greek emphasis dots & metrical marks Meeting Minutes Action Items <r12a> [10]http://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/open [10] http://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/open <r12a> close action-696 <trackbot> Closed action-696. <r12a> close action-697 <trackbot> Closed action-697. Info Share <r12a> [11]http://w3c.github.io/typography/gap-analysis/ language-matrix.html [11] http://w3c.github.io/typography/gap-analysis/language-matrix.html <r12a> [12]https://w3c.github.io/jlreq/gap-analysis/ [12] https://w3c.github.io/jlreq/gap-analysis/ r12a: Language matrix, links to docs where people can identify gap analysis … new one, an example that is developed. … incl. tests and figures; generates some info r12a: suggested a single group to contacts for Khmer & Lao … looking for Thai and Myanmar IMSC character sets <r12a> [13]https://www.w3.org/TR/ ttml-imsc1.0.1/#recommended-unicode-code-points-per-language [13] https://www.w3.org/TR/ttml-imsc1.0.1/#recommended-unicode-code-points-per-language JcK: Reposted to key thread, moving towards CLDR … looking for advice on that. <r12a> [14]https://github.com/w3c/imsc/issues/236 [14] https://github.com/w3c/imsc/issues/236 r12a: Talk about the wider question… … Application uses UTF-8, no need to specify the character set. … The fonts or rendering algorithms are not unavailable to support specific char-ranges / langs … Aims to assist authors b/c existing processes are poor at supporting foreign languages … One shouldn't take it too far, to rely on these applications … content authors may require some advice, to ensure that texts support these chars … symbols etc, commonly used in video transcriptions, may be unavailable in CLDR … when dealing with legacy applications, may find have poor support for multilingual texts … by implication, the application developers may not have multilingual support; … whereas this limits to specific sets of characters. … CLDR may not always be accurate or complete (?) … in thread, tried to suggest an alternative wording JcK: Have posted the wrong solution to the wrong problem. It's an interesting question. … if updating legacy application, should update accordingly r12a: If this is about legacy applications, then look at what charsets are supported … expecting that applications will rely on CLDR … meaning expecting applications to limit their support for chars JcK: The issue about chars in legacy applications, or langs not appearing in CLDR either, fact that imposing chars in langs which have no possible use for them. … Fundamentally, wrong solution to wrong problem … utility of decorated Latin chars is a little dubious. Taking us back to pre-Unicode definition of HTML. … suggests opening up a new thread, distance from fonts etc. r12a: recommends waiting to see what happens on this thread, first. r12a: More infoshare <r12a> [15]https://twitter.com/webi18n/status/ 966654589574549504 [15] https://twitter.com/webi18n/status/966654589574549504 r12a: Tweet explains the first public working draft of text layout for Arabic script. … lot of text; not yet many instructions for implementers. … publishing it may get some attention. Closing TTML Issues <r12a> [16]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ www-international/2018JanMar/0085.html [16] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-international/2018JanMar/0085.html <r12a> Proposed: Close all TTML issues listed at above URL <r12a> +1 <JcK> +1 +1 <Bert> +1 <r12a> Resolved Greek emphasis dots & metrical marks e.g. ⏒ 23D2 METRICAL LONG OVER SHORT JcK: Use of zero-width joiners; there are similar chars in Arabic or Hebrew that are aggravated by RTL r12a: Armenian explanation mark + question mark, that are displayed above the vowel nearest the end <r12a> [17]https://r12a.github.io/scripts/ armenian/#tonal_punctuation [17] https://r12a.github.io/scripts/armenian/#tonal_punctuation JcK: can you lose the emphasis marks without loss of meaning JcK: If there were a perfect normalisation algorithm, it would treat the emphasis marks in different ways. JcK: Charmod-Norm, getting a sophisticated use of lang typically requires lang specific info. … no. of one-to-one examples.
Received on Thursday, 22 February 2018 17:39:39 UTC