- From: r12a <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 17:39:28 +0000
- To: www International <www-international@w3.org>
https://www.w3.org/2018/02/22-i18n-minutes.html
text snapshot:
– DRAFT –
Internationalization Working Group Teleconference
22 February 2018
[2]IRC log
[2] https://www.w3.org/2018/02/22-i18n-irc
Attendees
Present
Bert, JcK, Katy, r12a
Regrets
Addison, Fuquiao
Chair
-
Scribe
katy
Contents
* [3]Meeting Minutes
1. [4]Action Items
2. [5]Info Share
3. [6]IMSC character sets
4. [7]More infoshare
5. [8]Closing TTML Issues
6. [9]Greek emphasis dots & metrical marks
Meeting Minutes
Action Items
<r12a> [10]http://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/open
[10] http://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/open
<r12a> close action-696
<trackbot> Closed action-696.
<r12a> close action-697
<trackbot> Closed action-697.
Info Share
<r12a> [11]http://w3c.github.io/typography/gap-analysis/
language-matrix.html
[11] http://w3c.github.io/typography/gap-analysis/language-matrix.html
<r12a> [12]https://w3c.github.io/jlreq/gap-analysis/
[12] https://w3c.github.io/jlreq/gap-analysis/
r12a: Language matrix, links to docs where people can identify
gap analysis
… new one, an example that is developed.
… incl. tests and figures; generates some info
r12a: suggested a single group to contacts for Khmer & Lao
… looking for Thai and Myanmar
IMSC character sets
<r12a> [13]https://www.w3.org/TR/
ttml-imsc1.0.1/#recommended-unicode-code-points-per-language
[13]
https://www.w3.org/TR/ttml-imsc1.0.1/#recommended-unicode-code-points-per-language
JcK: Reposted to key thread, moving towards CLDR
… looking for advice on that.
<r12a> [14]https://github.com/w3c/imsc/issues/236
[14] https://github.com/w3c/imsc/issues/236
r12a: Talk about the wider question…
… Application uses UTF-8, no need to specify the character set.
… The fonts or rendering algorithms are not unavailable to
support specific char-ranges / langs
… Aims to assist authors b/c existing processes are poor at
supporting foreign languages
… One shouldn't take it too far, to rely on these applications
… content authors may require some advice, to ensure that texts
support these chars
… symbols etc, commonly used in video transcriptions, may be
unavailable in CLDR
… when dealing with legacy applications, may find have poor
support for multilingual texts
… by implication, the application developers may not have
multilingual support;
… whereas this limits to specific sets of characters.
… CLDR may not always be accurate or complete (?)
… in thread, tried to suggest an alternative wording
JcK: Have posted the wrong solution to the wrong problem. It's
an interesting question.
… if updating legacy application, should update accordingly
r12a: If this is about legacy applications, then look at what
charsets are supported
… expecting that applications will rely on CLDR
… meaning expecting applications to limit their support for
chars
JcK: The issue about chars in legacy applications, or langs not
appearing in CLDR either, fact that imposing chars in langs
which have no possible use for them.
… Fundamentally, wrong solution to wrong problem
… utility of decorated Latin chars is a little dubious. Taking
us back to pre-Unicode definition of HTML.
… suggests opening up a new thread, distance from fonts etc.
r12a: recommends waiting to see what happens on this thread,
first.
r12a:
More infoshare
<r12a> [15]https://twitter.com/webi18n/status/
966654589574549504
[15] https://twitter.com/webi18n/status/966654589574549504
r12a: Tweet explains the first public working draft of text
layout for Arabic script.
… lot of text; not yet many instructions for implementers.
… publishing it may get some attention.
Closing TTML Issues
<r12a> [16]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/
www-international/2018JanMar/0085.html
[16]
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-international/2018JanMar/0085.html
<r12a> Proposed: Close all TTML issues listed at above URL
<r12a> +1
<JcK> +1
+1
<Bert> +1
<r12a> Resolved
Greek emphasis dots & metrical marks
e.g. ⏒ 23D2 METRICAL LONG OVER SHORT
JcK: Use of zero-width joiners; there are similar chars in
Arabic or Hebrew that are aggravated by RTL
r12a: Armenian explanation mark + question mark, that are
displayed above the vowel nearest the end
<r12a> [17]https://r12a.github.io/scripts/
armenian/#tonal_punctuation
[17] https://r12a.github.io/scripts/armenian/#tonal_punctuation
JcK: can you lose the emphasis marks without loss of meaning
JcK: If there were a perfect normalisation algorithm, it would
treat the emphasis marks in different ways.
JcK: Charmod-Norm, getting a sophisticated use of lang
typically requires lang specific info.
… no. of one-to-one examples.
Received on Thursday, 22 February 2018 17:39:39 UTC