[minutes] Internationalization telecon 2017-12-14

https://www.w3.org/2017/12/14-i18n-minutes.html#item05





text extract follows:


                                - DRAFT -

            Internationalization Working Group Teleconference

14 Dec 2017

    [2]Agenda

       [2] 
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2017Dec/0015.html

Attendees

    Present
           Addison, Richard, Fuqiao, Steve, Bert, JcK, Najib, (via,
           IRC)

    Regrets
    Chair
           Addison Phillips

    Scribe
           addison

Contents

      * [3]Topics
          1. [4]Agenda
          2. [5]Action Items
          3. [6]Info Share
          4. [7]Radar
          5. [8]Publish FPWD of ALREQ?
          6. [9]UTR53 comments
          7. [10]CSS text-decoration comment review
          8. [11]Charmod and String-Meta
          9. [12]AOB?
      * [13]Summary of Action Items
      * [14]Summary of Resolutions
      __________________________________________________________

    trackbot, prepare teleconference

    <scribe> ScribeNick: addison

Agenda

Action Items

    [15]https://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/open

      [15] https://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/open

    action-690?

    <trackbot> action-690 -- Addison Phillips to Include comment
    resolution for text-decoration next week and remind all to
    review issues -- due 2017-12-14 -- OPEN

    <trackbot>
    [16]http://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/690

      [16] http://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/690

    close action-690

    <trackbot> Closed action-690.

Info Share

    xfq: we have clreq meeting today
    ... plan to publish new WD
    ... saw previous one was published by richard
    ... haven't done a multi language doc before
    ... anything to pay attention to?

    richard: there were some things, need to look tomorrow
    ... ask I18N WG if okay to publish

    xfq: don't have formal resolution but rough consensus

    <xfq>
    [17]https://github.com/w3c/wpub/issues?q=is:open+is:issue+label
    :topic:internationalization

      [17] 
https://github.com/w3c/wpub/issues?q=is:open+is:issue+label:topic:internationalization

    <xfq>
    [18]https://github.com/w3c/wpub/issues/1#issuecomment-315815699

      [18] https://github.com/w3c/wpub/issues/1#issuecomment-315815699

    xfq: saw topics in above
    ... one mentioned our string-meta
    ... do we need to track?

    richard, addison: yes

    richard; couple of things

    <r12a> [19]https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/3091

      [19] https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/3091

    scribe: whatwg is looking at (iiuc) requiring HTML to be UTF-8

    addison: what??

    richard: another issue

    <r12a>
    [20]https://github.com/readium/readium-css/issues/26#issuecomme
    nt-351503354

      [20] 
https://github.com/readium/readium-css/issues/26#issuecomment-351503354

    <r12a>
    [21]https://github.com/w3c/typography/wiki/Setting-up-a-Gap-Ana
    lysis-Project

      [21] 
https://github.com/w3c/typography/wiki/Setting-up-a-Gap-Analysis-Project

    richard: set up a document about setting up to do a gap
    analysis
    ... welcome comments

Radar

    [22]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/projects/1

      [22] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/projects/1

    [23]http://w3c.github.io/i18n-activity/projects/

      [23] http://w3c.github.io/i18n-activity/projects/

    richard: UTR53 v2, I reviewed it , topic later
    ... published inline bidi
    ... now published
    ... lots of retweets and likes :-)

Publish FPWD of ALREQ?

    <r12a> [24]https://w3c.github.io/alreq/

      [24] https://w3c.github.io/alreq/

    richard: the ALREQ folks are working on a gap analysis also for
    the new year
    ... also wish to publish a FPWD
    ... some images missing that need fixing
    ... some additional text by beignning of year
    ... any objection?

    addison: do you support publication of ALREQ FPWD?

    +1

    <r12a> +

    <najib> +1

    <Steve_Atkin> +1

    <xfq> +1

    <r12a> +1

    <JcK> 0 (having not heard discussion)

    addison: so resolved

UTR53 comments

    richard: hopefully sent email that made clear

    <r12a> [25]http://w3c.github.io/i18n-activity/reviews/#utr53

      [25] http://w3c.github.io/i18n-activity/reviews/#utr53

    [26]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/517

      [26] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/517

    sounds like a good comment

    <scribe> ACTION: richard: put a foot in the door on UTR53
    comments if needed

    <trackbot> Created ACTION-691 - Put a foot in the door on utr53
    comments if needed [on Richard Ishida - due 2017-12-21].

CSS text-decoration comment review

    [27]http://w3c.github.io/i18n-activity/reviews/#css-text-decor

      [27] http://w3c.github.io/i18n-activity/reviews/#css-text-decor

    close 21

    [28]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/385

      [28] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/385

    richard: kind of fuzzy

    jck: some informal comments
    ... "never seen this before"

    addison: could conclude that it's unnecessary

    jck: add an explicit placeholder?
    ... prevent head-scratching?

    richard: might be useful to make them scratch their heads :-)

    [29]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/22

      [29] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/22

    <r12a> [30]https://github.com/w3c/jlreq/issues/8

      [30] https://github.com/w3c/jlreq/issues/8

    close 22 as a duplicate of 383?

    [31]https://www.w3.org/TR/css-text-decor-3/#text-emphasis-posit
    ion-property

      [31] 
https://www.w3.org/TR/css-text-decor-3/#text-emphasis-position-property

    Emphasis marks are drawn exactly as if each character was
    assigned the mark as its ruby annotation text with the ruby
    position given by ‘text-emphasis-position’ and the ruby
    alignment as centered.

    If emphasis marks are applied to characters for which ruby is
    drawn in the same position as the emphasis mark, the emphasis
    marks are placed above the ruby.

    addresses my comment

    close #22

Charmod and String-Meta

AOB?

    next teleconference on 11 January 2018

    (and there was much rejoicing)

Summary of Action Items

    [NEW] ACTION: richard: put a foot in the door on UTR53 comments
    if needed

Summary of Resolutions

    [End of minutes]

Received on Friday, 15 December 2017 13:35:49 UTC