- From: r12a <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 15:43:32 +0100
- To: www International <www-international@w3.org>
https://www.w3.org/2017/10/05-i18n-minutes.html text extract follows: Internationalization Working Group Teleconference 05 Oct 2017 See also: [2]IRC log [2] http://www.w3.org/2017/10/05-i18n-irc Attendees Present JcK, r12a, david, andrew, Bert Regrets Chair SV_MEETING_CHAIR Scribe r12a Contents * [3]Topics 1. [4]Action Items 2. [5]Info Share 3. [6]UTR 53 Unicode Arabic Mark Ordering Algorithm 4. [7]Issue triage 5. [8]Radars * [9]Summary of Action Items * [10]Summary of Resolutions __________________________________________________________ joining information is here [11]https://www.w3.org/2017/09/i18n-meeting-info.html [11] https://www.w3.org/2017/09/i18n-meeting-info.html previous minutes: [12]https://www.w3.org/2017/09/28-i18n-minutes.html [12] https://www.w3.org/2017/09/28-i18n-minutes.html visually KA+VIRAMA+SHA = KA+ZWJ+AA Action Items [13]http://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/open [13] http://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/open close action-656 <trackbot> Closed action-656. was "Notify websub we are satisfied with 124" De-pend all the css-text-decor issues close action-659 <trackbot> Closed action-659. Info Share none UTR 53 Unicode Arabic Mark Ordering Algorithm [14]http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr53/ [14] http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr53/ [15]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is %3Aopen+label%3Autr53 [15] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues?q=is:issue+is:open+label:utr53 [16]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/492#issuecommen t-334101665 [16] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/492#issuecomment-334101665 I'm beginning to suspect that the algorithm described is intended to just indicate how characters should be temporarily reordered prior to rendering, rather than describe the order in which code points should be stored. Since most fonts generally produce the behaviour described anyway, it would therefore amount to documenting expectations in terms of font behaviour, rather than specifying a new form of normalisation. It's not at all clear from the document whether that is the case, however, so i think that has to be our first question, and perhaps we need to await an answer to that before sending in many of the other comments. ]] JcK: I believe i concur ... it may describe new problems wrt confusables ... may be worth saying that if we correctly understood this, the document needs to be updated to make it clear <scribe> ACTION: Richard to raise comment against UTR53 asking for clarity about what they are trying to do [recorded in [17]http://www.w3.org/2017/10/05-i18n-minutes.html#action01] [17] http://www.w3.org/2017/10/05-i18n-minutes.html#action01 <trackbot> Created ACTION-660 - Raise comment against utr53 asking for clarity about what they are trying to do [on Richard Ishida - due 2017-10-12]. [18]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/490 [18] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/490 raise this as a personal comment RESOLUTION: Richard send comment for which he has action, then await response before sending more Issue triage [19]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-international/2017 OctDec/0002.html [19] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-international/2017OctDec/0002.html intersection-observer • rootMargin may need to be directionally sensitive [20]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/488 [20] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/488 <scribe> ACTION: Richard to send [21]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/488 to Intersection Observer group [recorded in [22]http://www.w3.org/2017/10/05-i18n-minutes.html#action02] [21] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/488 [22] http://www.w3.org/2017/10/05-i18n-minutes.html#action02 <trackbot> Created ACTION-661 - Send [23]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/488 to intersection observer group [on Richard Ishida - due 2017-10-12]. [23] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/488 [24]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/410 [24] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/410 agree to close [25]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/334 [25] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/334 added a note at [26]https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/commit/f9e4a418819b8226d0ce5c8 28befc55042848c9d [26] https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/commit/f9e4a418819b8226d0ce5c828befc55042848c9d agree to close Radars [27]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/projects/1 [27] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/projects/1 Any reaction for DNT would appreciated by the WG - so they can report status. even if no review done [28]http://w3c.github.io/typography/gap-analysis/language-matri x.html [28] http://w3c.github.io/typography/gap-analysis/language-matrix.html Meeting adjourned. Summary of Action Items [NEW] ACTION: Richard to raise comment against UTR53 asking for clarity about what they are trying to do [recorded in [29]http://www.w3.org/2017/10/05-i18n-minutes.html#action01] [NEW] ACTION: Richard to send https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/488 to Intersection Observer group [recorded in [30]http://www.w3.org/2017/10/05-i18n-minutes.html#action02] [29] http://www.w3.org/2017/10/05-i18n-minutes.html#action01 [30] http://www.w3.org/2017/10/05-i18n-minutes.html#action02 Summary of Resolutions 1. [31]Richard send comment for which he has action, then await response before sending more [End of minutes]
Received on Tuesday, 10 October 2017 14:43:17 UTC