- From: r12a <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 15:43:32 +0100
- To: www International <www-international@w3.org>
https://www.w3.org/2017/10/05-i18n-minutes.html
text extract follows:
Internationalization Working Group Teleconference
05 Oct 2017
See also: [2]IRC log
[2] http://www.w3.org/2017/10/05-i18n-irc
Attendees
Present
JcK, r12a, david, andrew, Bert
Regrets
Chair
SV_MEETING_CHAIR
Scribe
r12a
Contents
* [3]Topics
1. [4]Action Items
2. [5]Info Share
3. [6]UTR 53 Unicode Arabic Mark Ordering Algorithm
4. [7]Issue triage
5. [8]Radars
* [9]Summary of Action Items
* [10]Summary of Resolutions
__________________________________________________________
joining information is here
[11]https://www.w3.org/2017/09/i18n-meeting-info.html
[11] https://www.w3.org/2017/09/i18n-meeting-info.html
previous minutes:
[12]https://www.w3.org/2017/09/28-i18n-minutes.html
[12] https://www.w3.org/2017/09/28-i18n-minutes.html
visually KA+VIRAMA+SHA = KA+ZWJ+AA
Action Items
[13]http://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/open
[13] http://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/open
close action-656
<trackbot> Closed action-656.
was "Notify websub we are satisfied with 124"
De-pend all the css-text-decor issues
close action-659
<trackbot> Closed action-659.
Info Share
none
UTR 53 Unicode Arabic Mark Ordering Algorithm
[14]http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr53/
[14] http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr53/
[15]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is
%3Aopen+label%3Autr53
[15]
https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues?q=is:issue+is:open+label:utr53
[16]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/492#issuecommen
t-334101665
[16]
https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/492#issuecomment-334101665
I'm beginning to suspect that the algorithm described is
intended to just indicate how characters should be temporarily
reordered prior to rendering, rather than describe the order in
which code points should be stored. Since most fonts generally
produce the behaviour described anyway, it would therefore
amount to documenting expectations in terms of font behaviour,
rather than specifying a new form of normalisation.
It's not at all clear from the document whether that is the
case, however, so i think that has to be our first question,
and perhaps we need to await an answer to that before sending
in many of the other comments.
]]
JcK: I believe i concur
... it may describe new problems wrt confusables
... may be worth saying that if we correctly understood this,
the document needs to be updated to make it clear
<scribe> ACTION: Richard to raise comment against UTR53 asking
for clarity about what they are trying to do [recorded in
[17]http://www.w3.org/2017/10/05-i18n-minutes.html#action01]
[17] http://www.w3.org/2017/10/05-i18n-minutes.html#action01
<trackbot> Created ACTION-660 - Raise comment against utr53
asking for clarity about what they are trying to do [on Richard
Ishida - due 2017-10-12].
[18]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/490
[18] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/490
raise this as a personal comment
RESOLUTION: Richard send comment for which he has action, then
await response before sending more
Issue triage
[19]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-international/2017
OctDec/0002.html
[19]
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-international/2017OctDec/0002.html
intersection-observer
• rootMargin may need to be directionally sensitive
[20]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/488
[20] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/488
<scribe> ACTION: Richard to send
[21]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/488 to
Intersection Observer group [recorded in
[22]http://www.w3.org/2017/10/05-i18n-minutes.html#action02]
[21] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/488
[22] http://www.w3.org/2017/10/05-i18n-minutes.html#action02
<trackbot> Created ACTION-661 - Send
[23]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/488 to
intersection observer group [on Richard Ishida - due
2017-10-12].
[23] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/488
[24]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/410
[24] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/410
agree to close
[25]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/334
[25] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/334
added a note at
[26]https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/commit/f9e4a418819b8226d0ce5c8
28befc55042848c9d
[26]
https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/commit/f9e4a418819b8226d0ce5c828befc55042848c9d
agree to close
Radars
[27]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/projects/1
[27] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/projects/1
Any reaction for DNT would appreciated by the WG - so they can
report status.
even if no review done
[28]http://w3c.github.io/typography/gap-analysis/language-matri
x.html
[28] http://w3c.github.io/typography/gap-analysis/language-matrix.html
Meeting adjourned.
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: Richard to raise comment against UTR53 asking for
clarity about what they are trying to do [recorded in
[29]http://www.w3.org/2017/10/05-i18n-minutes.html#action01]
[NEW] ACTION: Richard to send
https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/488 to Intersection
Observer group [recorded in
[30]http://www.w3.org/2017/10/05-i18n-minutes.html#action02]
[29] http://www.w3.org/2017/10/05-i18n-minutes.html#action01
[30] http://www.w3.org/2017/10/05-i18n-minutes.html#action02
Summary of Resolutions
1. [31]Richard send comment for which he has action, then
await response before sending more
[End of minutes]
Received on Tuesday, 10 October 2017 14:43:17 UTC