- From: Najib Tounsi <ntounsi@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 15:14:04 +0100
- To: www-international@w3.org, "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com>
- Message-ID: <1f4fb8ac-cbaf-62d4-5c5e-978c69b9124f@emi.ac.ma>
Hello, Here are some few comments on the document. - Producer and consumer are used in a well defined way (section2). These terms are encountered two times earlier in §1.1, and even if the context is clear, I think it's better to indicate there that these words will be well defined later (section 2 in this case). - §1.1, 2nd paragraph after the JSON example, "[..] For each of the fields containing natural language text [..] there will be a language attribute and base direction stored as metadata [..] "These *data fields* are used in a variety of ways [..] I understand "These *metadata* are used ...". The wording "data fields" may create an ambiguity with the JSON fields containing text. Besides, you say "the data structure provides no place to store these [i.e. metadata]." - Last paragraph before §1.2 "They [producer and consumer] may have other considerations, such as field length, that are affected by the insertion of additional *controls* or markup". Or (among "other considerations") the fact that those controls may use different escape sequence, e.g. ‎ instead of \u200e. (Your example : "authors": [ "\u200eHerman Melville" ], // contains LRM as first character) Regards, Najib
Received on Monday, 24 July 2017 14:11:10 UTC