RE: Request for review of Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) before CR

Hello Holger,

Thanks for the note. I have added this request to our review radar.

While hopefully there are no I18N issues, I do have to point out that your moving to CR by the end of March kind of depends on our not finding any issues. Our process depends on a working group review of collected comments in our weekly teleconference. I have three requests ahead of yours in addition to the review of TTML2 that we are currently finishing up. If we were to find issues, you might not have time to respond to them and keep your date. Most working groups have spent significant time building their specifications. It is unreasonable to expect to get a thorough and valuable review on demand in only a week or two (leaving time for reaction). 

Regards (for I18N),

Addison

Addison Phillips
Principal SDE, I18N Architect (Amazon)
Chair (W3C I18N WG)

Internationalization is not a feature.
It is an architecture.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Holger Knublauch [mailto:holger@topquadrant.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2017 6:05 AM
> To: www-international@w3.org
> Cc: sandro@w3.org
> Subject: Request for review of Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) before CR
> 
> Hi,
> 
> the W3C Data Shapes Working Group would like to move its main deliverable
> 
>      http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/

> 
> to CR status by the end of March. We would appreciate a review of its i18n
> aspects.
> 
> SHACL is an RDF based language to describe constraints on data models.
> The language is built for machines and has almost no user interface aspects.
> Execution typically happens "server-side" and the output is a list of constraint
> violations. The handling of strings in multiple languages is inherited from RDF.
> We use this RDF mechanism in a couple of places, e.g. sh:name and sh:message,
> to define user output in multiple languages. But SHACL doesn't do anything
> beyond the RDF standard in this respect. I did the i18n self-test and nothing else
> raised my attention.
> 
> Thanks
> Holger
>

Received on Thursday, 2 March 2017 05:50:42 UTC