r12a has just labeled an issue for https://github.com/w3c/webvtt as "i18n": == Consider adding 'ruby-align' as a supported CSS property == https://w3c.github.io/webvtt/#selectordef-cue > ::cue In https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28183 it is pointed out that 'ruby-align' exists and could be useful. It's supported in Gecko and IE. We have an `align` cue setting which sets 'text-align' on the root element, and we don't allow setting 'text-align' with `::cue` or `::cue()`, but I don't see any problem with allowing 'ruby-align'. It doesn't affect the size of the ruby box, and you might want different alignment for the whole cue vs. ruby. For instance, if a cue contains a single ruby annotation and the cue is start-aligned, it could make sense to start-align the ruby as well. But if a cue contains a normal run of text and has some ruby annotations here and there, it might make more sense to use the default `space-around` ruby alignment regardless of the cue's alignment. See https://github.com/w3c/webvtt/issues/265Received on Friday, 21 October 2016 10:11:22 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:41:11 UTC