- From: Christopher Allan Webber <cwebber@dustycloud.org>
- Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 09:07:40 -0500
- To: "Phillips\, Addison" <addison@lab126.com>
- Cc: "www-international\@w3.org" <www-international@w3.org>, "public-socialweb\@w3.org" <public-socialweb@w3.org>
Phillips, Addison writes: > Hi, > > We'd be glad to review the doc. I will note that the 11th is a > Tuesday, which means that it will be difficult for the I18N WG to do a > review in time--our teleconferences are on Thursdays, so we have only > a week to do this review. Since we spoke at TPAC, I know you > understand: try to plan better next time :-). Also, I'm guessing this > is the same document with a shortname of "activitypub" [1] Yep, same document. Thank you! :) > Regards (for I18N), > > Addison > > Addison Phillips > Principal SDE, I18N Architect (Amazon) > Chair (W3C I18N WG) > > Internationalization is not a feature. > It is an architecture. > > > [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/activitypub/ > https://w3c-social.github.io/activitypub/ > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Christopher Allan Webber [mailto:cwebber@dustycloud.org] >> Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2016 2:14 PM >> To: www-international@w3.org >> Cc: public-socialweb@w3.org >> Subject: Requesting i18n review for ActivityPub >> >> Hello, >> >> ActivityPub is aiming to enter Candidate Recommendation by the 11th, and >> we'd like to request a review for any potential i18n issues. >> ActivityPub is a client to server (eg mobile applications, desktop applications, >> etc) and server to server (federation) standard for propagating social >> network activity through the web. >> >> I've gone through the checklist... I don't personally anticipate much to be >> flagged that hasn't already been so for ActivityStreams, on which ActivityPub >> heavily relies. ActivityPub uses ActivityStreams for its vocabulary and >> serialization mechanism (via json-ld), which has already gone through i18n >> review. Aside from that, most of what ActivityPub specifies is endpoints to >> which ActivityStreams objects may be submitted. >> >> Any and all feedback is welcome. Thank you! >> >> - Christopher Allan Webber, >> on behalf of ActivityPub and the Social WG
Received on Wednesday, 28 September 2016 14:08:18 UTC