Re: Requesting i18n review for ActivityPub

And foolishly, I forgot the link to the spec!

Latest editor's draft:
  https://w3c-social.github.io/activitypub/

 - Chris

Christopher Allan Webber writes:

> Hello,
>
> ActivityPub is aiming to enter Candidate Recommendation by the 11th, and
> we'd like to request a review for any potential i18n issues.
> ActivityPub is a client to server (eg mobile applications, desktop
> applications, etc) and server to server (federation) standard for
> propagating social network activity through the web.
>
> I've gone through the checklist... I don't personally anticipate much to
> be flagged that hasn't already been so for ActivityStreams, on which
> ActivityPub heavily relies.  ActivityPub uses ActivityStreams for its
> vocabulary and serialization mechanism (via json-ld), which has already
> gone through i18n review.  Aside from that, most of what ActivityPub
> specifies is endpoints to which ActivityStreams objects may be
> submitted.
>
> Any and all feedback is welcome.  Thank you!
>
>  - Christopher Allan Webber,
>    on behalf of ActivityPub and the Social WG

Received on Wednesday, 28 September 2016 12:18:23 UTC