- From: r12a <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 07:53:37 +0100
- To: "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com>, Nikos Andronikos <Nikos.Andronikos@cisra.canon.com.au>, "www-international@w3.org" <www-international@w3.org>
- Cc: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
On 09/08/2016 16:35, Phillips, Addison wrote: > Please be advised that reviews require at least two weeks, since the WG must review issues in our Thursday (1500UTC) teleconference and time must be provided to actually read your document. Btw, to my mind the time crunch really comes if we find something we believe needs to be changed. The review itself is usually much less time-consuming than the explanations, discussions, tracking, etc that are involved in addressing issues that arise. Just wanted to mention that so that it doesn't come as a surprise. cheers, ri
Received on Wednesday, 10 August 2016 06:53:51 UTC