- From: <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 20:15:11 +0100
- To: www International <www-international@w3.org>
https://www.w3.org/2016/06/28-alreq-minutes.html
text version follows:
Arabic Layout TF telecon
28 Jun 2016
See also: [2]IRC log
[2] http://www.w3.org/2016/06/28-alreq-irc
Attendees
Present
Shervin, r12a, Mostafa, Najib
Regrets
Chair
Shervin
Scribe
mostafa
Contents
* [3]Topics
file:///tmp/lynxXXXXuP98eR/L5738-1978TMP.html#agenda
* [4]Summary of Action Items
file:///tmp/lynxXXXXuP98eR/L5738-1978TMP.html#ActionSummary
* [5]Summary of Resolutions
__________________________________________________________
[5] file:///tmp/lynxXXXXuP98eR/L5738-1978TMP.html#ResolutionSummary
<scribe> ScribeNick: mostafa
<najib>
[6]https://github.com/w3c/alreq/wiki/Draft-for-%E2%80%9C2.3-Dir
ection%E2%80%9D
[6] https://github.com/w3c/alreq/wiki/Draft-for-“2.3-Direction”
Shervin: In the wiki page for the “2.3 direction’ draft I’m
seeing this draft.
Mostafa: I didn’t go into fine details and edge cases in this
draft.
... It’s just a big picture overview of how the Arabic text is
rendered.
<Shervin>
[7]http://unicode.org/cldr/utility/bidi.jsp?a=%DA%A9%D9%84%D9%8
5%D9%87+word&p=Auto
[7] http://unicode.org/cldr/utility/bidi.jsp?a=کلمه+word&p=Auto
Richard: The image for the logical/visual order can be a little
confusing.
... An arrow could help.
Shervin: Another option is to add position numbers.
<najib> s/Heh/Teh/
<najib> s/U+0647/U+0629/
Richard: We can use “display order” instead of “visual order”
to make it more clear.
Shervin: We can also use something like “memory order” for
“logical order”.
... Or “reordered string” instead of “visual order”.
... So, do you want me to merge this PR?
Mostafa: No, I have to update this using your feedbacks.
[8]http://quod.lib.umich.edu/j/jep/3336451.0013.105?rgn=main;vi
ew=fulltext
[8]
http://quod.lib.umich.edu/j/jep/3336451.0013.105?rgn=main;view=fulltext
Shervin: On the justification, there are two schools of
thought.
... One is discussed in the article “Justify Just or Just
Jusify”.
... The other is writen about by Thomas Milo.
Richard: Azzedine’s approach is based on adding more kashida.
... Tom’s approach also uses extra spaces between words and
inside words.
Shervin: In reality there should be a mix of kashida and
inter-word spaces.
Najib: Kashida and inter-word spaces are the main justification
mechanisms used in type-writers.
... Justification using ligatures is more complicated and not
easy to achieve using mechanics.
Richard: In InDesign they do allow you to use ligatures and
swash kaafs in the end of the words, which is not actually
kashida.
... Tom’s application, Tasmeem, is used in InDesign.
... But he also thinks that you have to use more spaces than
what Azzedine suggests.
... In type-writers a tatweel is used, not a kashida. They are
different.
... These are the tools used for streching the lines for
justification.
... And there are the rules for each writing style and each
tool.
Shervin: I agree that it’s not black or white.
... It’s also totally dependant on the environment.
... More complex environments can have, for example, longer
kaaf.
<Shervin> Shervin-
Shervin: Plain text environments are more limited and can
probably only use tatweels and extra spaces.
... We just have to cover the nuances of using these models.
Mostafa: We can only cover all these tools and solutions, and
mention that there are different approaches to mixing these
tools. We don’t have to make a decision ourselve.s
Shervin: +1
Richard: At a later step, we can also cover how browsers
implement Arabic justification.
... I suggest to use Tom Milo’s definitions for tatweel and
kashida.
... When he says “tatweel”, he means the Unicode character.
... But when he says kashida he means extending the horizontal
line of the letters.
Shervin: Behnam calls that elongation.
[9]https://github.com/w3c/alreq/wiki/Arabic-numerals-%281st-Dra
ft%29
[9] https://github.com/w3c/alreq/wiki/Arabic-numerals-(1st-Draft)
scribe: Moving on to Najib’s new text.
Najib: I want to cover different families of numbers, what are
their origins, and some of the issues regarding the number
families like fonts and keyboards.
<najib> Writing and reading numbers, bidi with numbers
Shervin: I suggest avoiding Arabic digits term for the
U+0030—U+0039.
... It’s defined in the glossary, we can use that.
Najib: I have a concern about pronounciation and how the Arab
read their numbers
... What about Persian?
Shervin: I’m not sure about that section. We are talking about
text, not how different languages read their texts.
Richard: +1
Najib: Action-37 is done.
Mostafa: Action-55 is still ongoing.
Summary of Action Items
Summary of Resolutions
[End of minutes]
Received on Tuesday, 28 June 2016 19:15:22 UTC