- From: r12a via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 12:04:20 +0000
- To: www-international@w3.org
r12a has just labeled an issue for https://github.com/w3c/html as "i18n": == Default styling for q element == **[This issue is carefully focused on language choices made by the styling shown in 10.3.6 Quotes in the spec. Please do not widen it to discuss the appropriateness of specific quotation marks proposed in that section for a given language, and please do not widen it to a more general discussion about the value or not of the q element. There are likely to be other issues raised for those points.]** Users expect default quotation marks around quotes to conform to the conventions of a particular language. For example, en-US typically uses “ ...”, whereas in Greek text a user may expect to see «...». A recent discussion on the Digital Publications IG list and the I18n IG list produced a groundswell of opinion that the styling indicating the selection of localised quotation marks in the HTML spec is incorrect. The choice of quotation marks should not be based on the language of the quote itself. Instead, the styling should look at the language outside the quote and use that to determine the quotation marks used. Furthermore, quotes embedded inside other quotes should by default still be surrounded by the quotation marks of the language outside the outermost level quote. The discussion lead to suggestions for two alternative ways to style default quotation marks. This is summarised in more detail at http://w3c.github.io/i18n-discuss/default-quote-styling. Please read. The i18n WG would like the folks working on HTML to consider these findings and propose a way forward. (fwiw, this also harks back to a bugzilla issue that was closed without complete resolution, and which can be found at https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13398) See https://github.com/w3c/html/issues/314
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2016 12:04:21 UTC